|Exam Name||:||Administration of Veritas Storage(R) Foundation 6.0 for Unix Technical Assessment|
|Questions and Answers||:||109 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||December 14, 2017|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||ST0-148 Brain Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure ST0-148 Full Version|
Which command will mirror an encapsulated boot disk?
On a site-aware Veritas Storage Foundation 6.0 for UNIX system, which file contains the name of the site to which the host belongs?
What will be the effect of reducing the compression block size by 50% when using vxcompress to compress files?
double the amount of logical data per compressed extent
double the amount of compressed data per compressed extent
half the amount of logical data per compressed extent
half the amount of compressed data per compressed extent
What are two benefits of using Storage Checkpoints within Veritas Storage Foundation
6.0 for UNIX instead of file system snapshots? (Select two.)
uses free space from parent file system
uses separate volume
Refer to the exhibit.
The appvol volume contains a Veritas File System (VxFS) file system and is mounted to
/app. The volume has experienced multiple disk failures. What is the state of the data on the mounted file system?
fully accessible Answer: D QUESTION: 108
Which switch needs to be added to the vxdg -g diskgroup adddisk disk_name command to force Veritas Volume Manager (VxVM) to take the disk media name of the failed disk and assign it to a replacement disk?
What happens when a mirrored volume is converted to RAID-5?
All plexes of the mirrored volume are converted to RAID-5.
One plex is converted to RAID-5 and all other plexes are removed.
The number of plexes converted depends on how many columns the RAID-5 volume has.
The number of plexes converted depends on the stripe unit size.
Cyber Monday Sale! forty% Off
Get limitless entry to all ExamCollection's top rate info!
Enter Your e-mail handle to receive Your 40% Off cut price Code
Please enter a correct electronic mail to Get your cut price Code
download Free Demo of VCEExam Simulator
experience Avanset VCE examination Simulator for your self.
quite simply submit your electronic mail tackle under to get begun with our interactive software demo of your free trial.
another chapter on my experience assisting a consumer undertake crew system. This time, the goal became to transform their NUnit look at various to crew device exams.
here's now not a really intricate subject matter given the high-quality conversion tool purchasable on gotdotnet (right here), which definitely does all of the give you the results you want. although, I did bump into a couple of concerns.
before going into that, here is the basic method I adopted (fortunately, NUnit assessments have been alread ST0-148y positioned in a single venture (*.look at various)):
a. Create a brand new look at various venture (named *.look at various.TS)
b. Create the crucial undertaking folders
c. Add the vital references
d. reproduction *.cs info from *.test task to *.verify.TS
e. Set assignment homes if imperative (build region, postbuild hobbies, and many others.)
g. operate a look at various run with NUnit to determine every little thing is eco-friendly
h. Run the NUnit Converter
i. get rid of Nunit references and build once again
j. Run exams in TS and investigate results with corresponding run in Nunit (g)
okay. Commit pending alterations
When the examine mission is created, a .vsmdi and a .testrunconfig file are also created and introduced to the soluiton folder. If new tests are brought to the answer, the vsmdi file will deserve to be checked out. to see the entire assessments accessible for the answer, open .vsmdi file (it presents an inventory view of the look at various which can be sorted and grouped -- n.b. the possibility of grouping checks into lists is just attainable in case you have VS group version for Testers).
When converting a big venture (about 2000 checks), I needed to get across the following considerations:
1. category Attribute
classes don't exist in crew system. The option is to use Description attribute or lists (lists are most effective available in the Tester edition). The converter device reacts as follows when discovering a category attribute:
exchange class("\(.+\)"),class("\(.+\)")\] by using category("\1")]\n[TestProperty("Category","\2")\]
for instance: [Test, Category("Business"), Category("More Business")] becomes [Test, Category("Business")] [TestProperty("Category","More Business")]
word that here is simply a temporary answer to get the converter tool to run except the end. The final conversion gives this [TestMethod(), TestProperty("Category","Business")] [TestProperty("Category","More Business")] which is not proper because the identical property is used twice with diverse values. The 2d property should be changed to TestProperty("Category2","more business"), as an instance (or use Description attribute as an alternative).
2. Partial courses
Partial classes don't seem to be transformed as a result of they do not have the TestFixture attribute. You deserve to add it in order for the conversion to run, however afterwards remvoe the corresponding TestClass attribute (since it is a replica on the grounds that the category changed into partial).
3. Static methods.
as a result of the TestFixtureSetUp conversion to ClassInitialize(), some methods had to be converted to static. additionally, seeing that the initialize system is now static, it cannot be overriden anymore, but it surely does not in fact count number because of factor four.
Let me clarify. The preliminary scenario become as follows: you've got a set of examine courses that inherit from a mother or father classification. This parent category carries a examine install system used by means of just about all children. those that need some added/distinct initialization override the formula. Like this:[TestFixture] public class BaseTest [TestFixtureSetUp] public digital void InitializeTests() // do some initialization [TestFixture] public classification MyTest1 : BaseTest [Test] public voic SomeTest base.InitializeTests(); // do other issues [TestFixture] public class MyTest2 : BaseTest [Test] public voic SomeOtherTest base.InitializeTests(); // do other issues public override void InitializeTests() // do any other initialization
This state of affairs doesn't work anymore in team device as a result of points3 and four (initialize methods are static and inheritance isn't supported.
four. Inheritance is not supported in team device unit assessments.
sure, that is disappointing. This explains why the [TestFixtureSetUp] strategies in a parent courses is not called. In team equipment trying out framework there are three attributes to initialize/clear up checks:
you should use these attributes. My advised solution is to replace the TestFixtureSetUp attributes (transformed to ClassInitialize()) in a parent classification by AssemblyInitialize and reorganize tests in order that all exams desiring this specific initialization are in this meeting.
Given the instance above, this means casting off inheritance, including an AssemblyInitialize on the InitializeTests method, and relocating the MyTest2 type to an additional assembly (if you don't need it to use the InitializeTests at all) or including a TestInitialize system to MyTest2.InitializeTests (if you need to add some added initialization particular to SomeOtherTest).
5. missing TestFixture attribute
If a category doesn't have the [TestFixture] attribute, it isn't converted (despite the fact that it consists of verify methods).
here's the way I went about the "Validate a Sudoku Board” issue. besides the fact that children, keep in mind there are distinctive how you can resolve this, so don't fret if your answer has variations and it’s completely feasible there are more effective methods.
feel free to indicate your solution within the feedback here or in the common put up, however please be respectful of others’ efforts.My strategy
This one is relatively straight-ahead, your primary task is to make sure that the cost of any given phone isn’t replicated within the cellphone’s row, column, or “cube”. The problem is the way you go about this. there is an area-effective method, but requires more looping, or there is a method that requires only travelling any cellphone one time, but requires extra house.
seeing that the puzzle is mounted in size (9x9 grid), I’ll opt for more advantageous algorithmic complexity and use space to grasp the set of all numbers considered for each and every given row, column, and dice. through the use of 27 units to cling these values (9 for the rows, 9 for the columns, 9 for the cubes), we are able to comfortably see if we’ve alread ST0-148y seen the latest quantity within the given row, column, or dice and instantly declare the puzzle invalid.
Of course, we may get even more house-effective and use 27 BitArrays (or one gigantic one partitioned, etc.), but then we lose the magnificence of set good judgment. i admire protecting issues logically basic and then optimizing for house after opting for there is a need, so I’d likely choose to make use of units in my normal reply in an comparison, after which mention that if area have been a priority, i might then optimize to BitArray.
So, right here’s my answer:1: public classification SudokuBoard 2: 3: deepest read ST0-148only char[,] board; four: 5: // validate board is a 9x9 array 6: public SudokuBoard(char[,] board) 7: eight: if (board == null 15: 16: public bool Validate() 17: 18: // yes, i may use BitArray for space efficiency, but i admire the logical consider 19: // of the set and how it returns false on Add() if alread ST0-148y there. 20: var rows = Enumerable.range(1, 9).select(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 21: var columns = Enumerable.range(1, 9).opt for(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 22: var cubes = Enumerable.range(1, 9).select(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 23: 24: // technique every mobilephone only as soon as 25: for (int row = 0; row < 9; ++row) 26: 27: for (int column = 0; column < 9; ++column) 28: 29: var present = board[row, column]; 30: if (char.IsDigit(present)) 31: 41: forty two: forty three: forty four: return authentic; 45: 46:
note that I’m not checking for invalid characters for the sake of brevity, although we could without difficulty try this in the constructor, or in the Validate() formula itself:1: var latest = board[row, column]; 2: if (char.IsDigit(present)) three: 4: // blah blah blah 5: 6: else if (!char.IsWhiteSpace(present)) 7: 8: return false; 9:
finally, here’s a simple driver for instance utilization:1: public static classification Driver 2: three: public static void function() 4: 5: var board = new char[9,9] 6: 7: '5', 'three', ' ', ' ', '7', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 8: '6', ' ', ' ', '1', '9', '5', ' ', ' ', ' ', 9: ' ', '9', 'eight', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', '6', ' ', 10: 'eight', ' ', '2', ' ', '6', ' ', ' ', ' ', 'three', eleven: '4', ' ', ' ', '8', ' ', 'three', ' ', ' ', '1', 12: '7', ' ', ' ', ' ', '2', ' ', ' ', ' ', '6', 13: ' ', '6', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', '2', 'eight', ' ', 14: ' ', ' ', ' ', '4', '1', '9', ' ', ' ', '5', 15: ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 'eight', ' ', ' ', '7', '9', sixteen: ; 17: 18: var validator = new SudokuBoard(board); 19: 20: Console.WriteLine("The Sudoku board is " + (validator.Validate() ? "legitimate" : "invalid")); 21: 22: abstract
Hope you had fun with this one! Of path, I’m sure many available can tweak the answer for efficiency in a considerable number of techniques – but you get the point.
Have a solution that labored for you however become absolutely distinct? I’d love to hear about it!
reside tuned next week for the next Little Puzzler.
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — U.S. Rep. Raul Labrador is at odds with Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter, with both on opposite aspects of the Republican closed fundamental.
Labrador advised the Idaho Statesman he supports it, whereas Otter urged Republicans to rethink restrictions on who can vote.
Otter fears forcing americans to publicly declare ballot choice angered voters, miserable Tuesday's turnout to 23 percent.
Labrador contends the fundamental helped limit Republican nominations to Republican voters.
Otter and Labrador have a history of disagreeing.
In 2008, Labrador adverse Otter's choice to lead Idaho's Republican party.
In 2009, Otter pushed elevating fuel taxes, while Labrador adverse it.
For Democratic birthday celebration Chairman Larry provide, Labrador's intent is clear: To prepare for a 2014 gubernatorial bid.
Labrador's crusade failed to instantly comment.
to date, Otter has referred to he'll run.
© 2016 The associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may additionally now not be posted, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.