|Exam Name||:||Administration of Veritas Cluster Server(R) 6.0 for Unix Technical Assessment|
|Questions and Answers||:||108 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||December 13, 2017|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||ST0-147 Brain Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure ST0-147 Full Version|
An administrator needs to manually add a new resource type to a running cluster. What should the administrator do after installing the agent software on each Veritas Cluster Server (VCS) node?
generate the appropriate hatype commands with hacf -addtype
use the hatype command to add the new resource type
stop and restart VCS so that the new resource type is recognized as valid
use the hares command to add the new resource type to the cluster
Which command should be used to view keyless licenses on a Veritas cluster?
The Veritas Cluster Server (VCS) notifier resource and VCS triggers can be configured to generate messages to assist in VCS administration. Which other facility can be a source of notifications within a comprehensive VCS implementation?
Cluster Manager Java console
Veritas Operations Manager
Storage Foundation Manager
Veritas Enterprise Manager
Two clusters are both running the same operating system and version of Veritas Cluster Server. A service group in one cluster depends on a service group in the other cluster. Which method can be used to manage the service group relationship?
An installed cluster has been licensed with the keyless licensing option. The administrator has yet to configure the cluster to be managed by Veritas Operations Manager (VOM). What will happen when 60 days have passed since installation?
The cluster will shut down.
The cluster will log messages related to licensing.
The cluster will ignore licensing.
The cluster will cease to respond if a resource faults.
On which system can you set UseMpathd=1 in a MultiNICB resource?
What is the primary benefit of implementing the Intelligent Monitoring Framework feature for resources?
prevention of concurrency violations
monitoring of resources running on remote clusters
immediate notification of resource state change
monitoring of resources without need of configuration
Which agent entry point is used when running a virtual fire drill for a specific resource?
Refer to the following information: OnlineTimeoutInterval = 60 OnlineRetryLimit
= 2 MonitorInterval = 120 RestartLimit = 0 What will occur if an application takes 70 seconds to come online during the online process?
The application will come online without any issues.
The applications monitor will timeout and cause the application to failover.
The application will fail to be brought online and will attempt to failover to another cluster node.
The application will fail to be brought online and will try again.
What are two resource types that Proxy resources can reference? (Select two.)
How is Intelligent Monitoring Framework configured?
It is automatically configured but only on supported agents.
It is automatically configured on all agents.
It needs to be manually configured on each agent.
It needs to be manually configured on each cluster node.
Which Veritas Cluster Server command should be used to change OnlineRetryLimit for all Mount resources?
The I/O fencing configuration for a Veritas cluster uses one Coordination Point (CP) server and two local coordinator disks. There are two network connections between the cluster and the CP server. A resource of type CoordPoint has been configured in the cluster using all default resource attribute values. Which resource attribute value for the resource of type CoordPoint needs to be modified so that the resource will fault only when both network connections to the CP server fail even though the coordination disks are still accessible?
An administrator stopped veritas cluster server (VCS) on the sym1 node to remove it from the cluster. When attempting to do this with the hasys-delete command from sym2, an error message is deplayed. What is the likely cause of this error?
One or more SystemList attributes still contains sym1.
VCS must be completely shut down on all nodes.
The vxfen daemon on sym1 is still running.
The GAB daemon on sym1 is still running.
Cyber Monday Sale! 40% Off
ExamCollection top class
Get limitless access to all ExamCollection's premium data!
Enter Your e-mail address to get hold of Your 40% Off bargain Code
Please enter a correct email to Get your bargain Code
download Free Demo of VCEExam Simulator
experience Avanset VCE exam Simulator for your self.
simply publish your email handle under to get all started with our interactive application demo of your free trial.
an additional chapter on my journey assisting a client undertake crew device. This time, the intention turned into to transform their NUnit look at various to group system exams.
this is now not a very problematic theme given the top notch conversion device obtainable on gotdotnet (right here), which in fact does all of the work for you. however, I did come across a few issues.
earlier than going into that, this is the simple technique I followed (happily, NUnit exams were alread ST0-147y positioned in a single venture (*.check)):
a. Create a new test undertaking (named *.look at various.TS)
b. Create the vital challenge folders
c. Add the fundamental references
d. copy *.cs files from *.check undertaking to *.examine.TS
e. Set challenge homes if critical (construct location, postbuild movements, etc.)
g. function a check run with NUnit to determine everything is green
h. Run the NUnit Converter
i. remove Nunit references and construct once more
j. Run exams in TS and check results with corresponding run in Nunit (g)
k. Commit pending changes
When the examine assignment is created, a .vsmdi and a .testrunconfig file are also created and added to the soluiton folder. If new exams are brought to the solution, the vsmdi file will should be checked out. to see all of the tests accessible for the solution, open .vsmdi file (it presents a listing view of the check which can also be sorted and grouped -- n.b. the probability of grouping checks into lists is simply accessible if you have VS group version for Testers).
When converting a huge challenge (about 2000 exams), I had to get across the following concerns:
1. class Attribute
classes don't exist in team gadget. The choice is to make use of Description attribute or lists (lists are handiest attainable within the Tester version). The converter tool reacts as follows when discovering a category attribute:
change class("\(.+\)"),class("\(.+\)")\] through class("\1")]\n[TestProperty("Category","\2")\]
as an example: [Test, Category("Business"), Category("More Business")] becomes [Test, Category("Business")] [TestProperty("Category","More Business")]
observe that here's simply a brief solution to get the converter tool to run unless the end. The final conversion offers this [TestMethod(), TestProperty("Category","Business")] [TestProperty("Category","More Business")] which isn't correct since the identical property is used twice with distinct values. The 2nd property may still be modified to TestProperty("Category2","extra company"), as an instance (or use Description attribute as a substitute).
2. Partial courses
Partial courses aren't transformed as a result of they don't have the TestFixture attribute. You deserve to add it in order for the conversion to run, but afterwards remvoe the corresponding TestClass attribute (since it is a replica considering the fact that the classification turned into partial).
3. Static strategies.
due to the TestFixtureSetUp conversion to ClassInitialize(), some strategies had to be converted to static. also, considering that the initialize formula is now static, it can't be overriden anymore, but it surely does not definitely depend because of factor 4.
Let me explain. The initial situation became as follows: you've got a collection of verify courses that inherit from a mother or father classification. This mother or father class consists of a verify installation components used by means of almost all little ones. those who want some added/diverse initialization override the formulation. Like this:[TestFixture] public classification BaseTest [TestFixtureSetUp] public virtual void InitializeTests() // do some initialization [TestFixture] public classification MyTest1 : BaseTest [Test] public voic SomeTest base.InitializeTests(); // do different issues [TestFixture] public type MyTest2 : BaseTest [Test] public voic SomeOtherTest base.InitializeTests(); // do different issues public override void InitializeTests() // do another initialization
This scenario does not work anymore in crew equipment on account of points3 and four (initialize methods are static and inheritance is not supported.
four. Inheritance is not supported in crew system unit tests.
sure, it truly is disappointing. This explains why the [TestFixtureSetUp] strategies in a parent courses isn't referred to as. In crew device testing framework there are three attributes to initialize/clear up assessments:
be sure to use these attributes. My counseled answer is to substitute the TestFixtureSetUp attributes (transformed to ClassInitialize()) in a mum or dad category through AssemblyInitialize and reorganize assessments in order that all tests needing this selected initialization are during this meeting.
Given the instance above, this skill putting off inheritance, including an AssemblyInitialize on the InitializeTests components, and moving the MyTest2 class to an extra assembly (if you don't desire it to use the InitializeTests in any respect) or adding a TestInitialize formulation to MyTest2.InitializeTests (if you want to add some additional initialization certain to SomeOtherTest).
5. lacking TestFixture attribute
If a class doesn't have the [TestFixture] attribute, it isn't transformed (in spite of the fact that it includes examine methods).
here is the manner I went in regards to the "Validate a Sudoku Board” issue. besides the fact that children, take into account there are varied how to solve this, so don't agonize in case your solution has diversifications and it’s fully possible there are extra productive methods.
feel free to indicate your solution within the comments here or in the customary put up, but please be respectful of others’ efforts.My strategy
This one is relatively straight-ahead, your simple project is to be certain that the cost of any given phone isn’t replicated within the mobile’s row, column, or “cube”. The difficulty is how you go about this. there's a space-efficient way, but requires more looping, or there's a technique that requires best traveling any mobile one time, but requires further area.
due to the fact that the puzzle is mounted in size (9x9 grid), I’ll decide on greater algorithmic complexity and use space to cling the set of all numbers viewed for every given row, column, and cube. by using 27 sets to hang these values (9 for the rows, 9 for the columns, 9 for the cubes), we are able to with ease see if we’ve alread ST0-147y viewed the existing number within the given row, column, or cube and instantly declare the puzzle invalid.
Of course, we might get much more area-productive and use 27 BitArrays (or one giant one partitioned, and so on.), however then we lose the class of set common sense. i like protecting issues logically primary after which optimizing for house after picking out there's a necessity, so I’d probably choose to use sets in my common reply in an assessment, and then mention that if space were a concern, i'd then optimize to BitArray.
So, here’s my answer:1: public type SudokuBoard 2: 3: deepest read ST0-147only char[,] board; 4: 5: // validate board is a 9x9 array 6: public SudokuBoard(char[,] board) 7: 8: if (board == null 15: 16: public bool Validate() 17: 18: // sure, i may use BitArray for area efficiency, but i love the logical think 19: // of the set and the way it returns false on Add() if alread ST0-147y there. 20: var rows = Enumerable.range(1, 9).select(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 21: var columns = Enumerable.range(1, 9).select(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 22: var cubes = Enumerable.range(1, 9).choose(i => new HashSet<char>()).ToArray(); 23: 24: // manner each and every mobilephone best once 25: for (int row = 0; row < 9; ++row) 26: 27: for (int column = 0; column < 9; ++column) 28: 29: var latest = board[row, column]; 30: if (char.IsDigit(present)) 31: 41: forty two: forty three: forty four: return actual; 45: forty six:
notice that I’m not checking for invalid characters for the sake of brevity, notwithstanding we could without difficulty try this within the constructor, or in the Validate() formula itself:1: var latest = board[row, column]; 2: if (char.IsDigit(present)) three: 4: // blah blah blah 5: 6: else if (!char.IsWhiteSpace(current)) 7: 8: return false; 9:
eventually, right here’s an easy driver for example usage:1: public static classification Driver 2: 3: public static void function() 4: 5: var board = new char[9,9] 6: 7: '5', 'three', ' ', ' ', '7', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 8: '6', ' ', ' ', '1', '9', '5', ' ', ' ', ' ', 9: ' ', '9', 'eight', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', '6', ' ', 10: 'eight', ' ', '2', ' ', '6', ' ', ' ', ' ', '3', 11: '4', ' ', ' ', 'eight', ' ', 'three', ' ', ' ', '1', 12: '7', ' ', ' ', ' ', '2', ' ', ' ', ' ', '6', 13: ' ', '6', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', '2', 'eight', ' ', 14: ' ', ' ', ' ', 'four', '1', '9', ' ', ' ', '5', 15: ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 'eight', ' ', ' ', '7', '9', sixteen: ; 17: 18: var validator = new SudokuBoard(board); 19: 20: Console.WriteLine("The Sudoku board is " + (validator.Validate() ? "legitimate" : "invalid")); 21: 22: summary
Hope you had enjoyable with this one! Of route, I’m certain many obtainable can tweak the reply for efficiency in various techniques – however you get the element.
Have a solution that worked for you but turned into totally distinctive? I’d like to hear about it!
live tuned next week for the next Little Puzzler.