IBM Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud

IBM proclaims New SmartCloud features, Partnership With Nirvanix | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM has these days multiplied its cloud computing services for commercial enterprise with the launch of recent IBM SmartCloud capabilities. These new offerings encompass SmartCloud utility functions, IBM’s new PaaS for commercial enterprise, a portfolio of hardware and application called SmartCloud foundation, and SmartCloud Ecosystem, which includes new capabilities for IBM partners and ISVs.

The enterprise plans to assist round 200 million users by way of the end of 2012.

IBM says that it has ported SAP, ERP and all database applications to its SmartCloud platform. With its new functions, it could actually now automate labor-intensive tasks linked to running SAP within the cloud, specially SAP cloning, refreshes and patching. In some instances, IBM says the time mark downs can go from months or weeks to days or hours, reckoning on the task.

also announced these days is a brand new partnership with Nirvanix, a cloud storage business. Going forward, Nirvanix’s cloud storage technology may be integrated into IBM’s SmartCloud business storage services, allowing customers to add info of any measurement, any place on the planet, and entry them from any place. The storage-as-a-carrier offering can aid millions of clients, billions of objects and exabytes of facts.

meanwhile, IBM’s new platform-as-a-carrier providing, SmartCloud software functions (SCAS) will launch into beta this 12 months (this autumn), offering enterprise–grade security, open Java and go-platform help without a vendor lock-in, and a complete set of application infrastructure and managed features to enable development and deployment of functions to the cloud. It will run on IBM’s SmartCloud business and enterprise+ – the commercial enterprise-class infrastructure-as-a-platform especially designed to run commercial enterprise workloads at committed SLAs (provider level agreements). IBM SmartCloud commercial enterprise+ is available in the U.S., and should be deployed worldwide with the aid of the end of 2012.

finally, the brand new SmartCloud groundwork family unit of private cloud solutions aims to assist businesses instantly design and install deepest cloud environments, and includes SmartCloud Entry, prepackaged private cloud software, plus SmartCloud provisioning and monitoring application.

AIS network Names Eddie McAndrew Chief working Officer | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

In Case IBM Tumbles | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Unquestionably it is hard assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. We never trade off on our review, reputation and quality on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Uniquely we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something like this, simply remember there are constantly awful individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our specimen questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-2]

P2150-739 study guide | HP0-D11 mock exam | 500-801 braindumps | 3302 test prep | ACE001 practice test | 2B0-103 braindumps | MB7-255 questions and answers | MBLEX cheat sheets | 310-879 VCE | IBMSPSSMBPDM study guide | C2090-463 questions and answers | CPIM braindumps | C2020-612 study guide | HP0-086 brain dumps | 70-486 practice questions | COMLEX-USA free pdf download | P4070-005 test prep | 000-M75 pdf download | 000-M02 real questions | 1Z0-105 practice exam |

Get high marks in C2010-659 exam with these dumps
killexams.com facilitates millions of candidates pass the exams and get their certifications. We have thousands of successful testimonials. Our dumps are reliable, cheap, up to date and of truly fine exceptional to overcome the problems of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are modern day updated in notably outclass manner on regular basis and material is released periodically.

IBM C2010-659 is ubiquitous all round the international, and also the business and package program answers are being embraced with the help of nearly all the organizations. Comprehensive power of IBM test prep products are taken into prepation a very crucial qualification, and also the specialists certified through them are quite valued in the IT Industry. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exam on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders At killexams.com, we have an approach to provide IBM C2010-659 actual Questions and Answers that are recently needed for Passing C2010-659 exam. we have an approach to really guide people to reinforce their information to recollect the Q&A and guarantee. It is a best call to hurry up your position as a professional within the business. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/C2010-659

At killexams.com, we give examined IBM C2010-659 real exam questions the best to pass C2010-659 exam, and to get certified by IBM. It is a best decision to enliven your work as a pro in the Information Technology industry. We are happy with our notoriety of helping individuals breeze through the C2010-659 test in their first endeavors. Our flourishing rates in the previous two years have been absolutely unprecedented, because of our happy clients by and by arranged to incite their occupations in the most advanced arrangement of assault. killexams.com is the essential decision among IT experts, particularly the ones intending to climb the development levels quicker in their individual organizations. IBM is the business pioneer in data improvement, and getting certified by them is an ensured approach to manage win with IT employments. We enable you to do effectively that with our splendid IBM C2010-659 preparing materials.

IBM C2010-659 is inescapable all around the globe, and the business and programming approaches gave by them are understood by every last one of the organizations. They have helped in driving a broad number of relationship on the shot strategy for progress. Far reaching learning of IBM things are viewed as a fundamental limit, and the masters certified by them are phenomenally respected in all organizations.

We offer true blue C2010-659 pdf exam question and answers braindumps in two designs. Download PDF and Practice Tests. Pass IBM C2010-659 genuine Exam rapidly and feasibly. The C2010-659 braindumps PDF sort is accessible for looking at and printing. You can print continuously and rehearse typically. Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the comparability rate between our C2010-659 syllabus prep oversee and genuine exam is 90% Considering our seven-year educating establishment. Do you require accomplishments in the C2010-659 exam in only a solitary attempt? I am right now breaking down for the IBM C2010-659 genuine exam.

As the primary concern in any way basic here is passing the C2010-659 - Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam. As all that you require is a high score of IBM C2010-659 exam. The main a single thing you have to do is downloading braindumps of C2010-659 exam prep facilitates now. We won't let you down with our unlimited certification. The masters in like way keep pace with the most best in class exam to give the greater part of updated materials. Three Months free access to be able to them through the date of procurement. Each competitor may bear the cost of the C2010-659 exam dumps through killexams.com expecting practically no exertion. no hazard required by any stretch of the imagination..

Inside observing the true blue exam material of the brain dumps at killexams.com you can without a ton of a stretch out build up your distinguishing strength. For the IT experts, it is essential to upgrade their abilities as appeared by their work require. We make it fundamental for our clients to convey certification exam with the assistance of killexams.com certified and true blue exam material. For a great future in its area, our brain dumps are the best choice.

A best dumps making is a fundamental fragment that makes it clear for you to take IBM certifications. Regardless, C2010-659 braindumps PDF offers settlement for applicants. The IT attestation is a basic troublesome endeavor on the off chance that one doesn't find honest to goodness course as clear asset material. Accordingly, we have honest to goodness and updated material for the masterminding of certification exam.

It is basic to gather to the guide material on the off chance that one needs toward spare time. As you require packs of time to search for restored and honest to goodness exam material for taking the IT accreditation exam. if you find that at one place, what could be superior to this? Its just killexams.com that has what you require. You can spare time and keep up a vital separation from inconvenience if you purchase Adobe IT certification from our site.

You ought to get the most restored IBM C2010-659 Braindumps with the right answers, set up by killexams.com experts, engaging the probability to comprehend getting some answers concerning their C2010-659 exam course in the best, you won't discover C2010-659 outcomes of such quality wherever in the market. Our IBM C2010-659 Practice Dumps are given to applicants at performing 100% in their exam. Our IBM C2010-659 exam dumps are most recent in the market, empowering you to plan for your C2010-659 exam in the correct way.

On the off chance that you are had with reasonably finishing the IBM C2010-659 exam to begin acquiring? killexams.com has driving edge made IBM exam keeps an eye on that will promise you pass this C2010-659 exam! killexams.com passes on you the most right, present and most recent restored C2010-659 exam inquiries and open with 100% bona fide ensure guarantee. various organizations that give C2010-659 mind dumps yet those are not correct and most recent ones. Game-plan with killexams.com C2010-659 new demand is an absolute best approach to manage pass this certification exam in fundamental way.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


We are advised that a basic issue in the IT business is that inaccessibility of critical worth prep materials. Our exam planning material gives every one of you that you should take an certification exam. Our IBM C2010-659 Exam will give you exam question with certified answers that mirror the veritable exam. These ask for and answers give you the experience of taking the true blue test. High bore and force for the C2010-659 Exam. 100% certification to pass your IBM C2010-659 exam and get your IBM authentication. We at killexams.com are made arrangements to enable you to pass your C2010-659 exam with high scores. The odds of you neglect to breeze through your C2010-659 test, after experiencing our general exam dumps are in every practical sense nothing.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-4]

Killexams 9A0-136 cram | Killexams 1Z0-495 braindumps | Killexams E20-385 Practice Test | Killexams A2040-407 free pdf download | Killexams 650-304 exam prep | Killexams Prince2 real questions | Killexams 000-955 Practice test | Killexams 1Z0-593 test prep | Killexams 4H0-200 practice questions | Killexams 2B0-104 practice test | Killexams HP0-D24 study guide | Killexams 000-923 real questions | Killexams HP0-Y36 exam prep | Killexams LOT-916 brain dumps | Killexams 400-251 study guide | Killexams HP2-E45 bootcamp | Killexams 1Z0-414 dump | Killexams 156-315.77 brain dumps | Killexams HP2-H35 test prep | Killexams 200-046 braindumps |

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-5]

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps

Killexams 250-400 real questions | Killexams A4040-124 braindumps | Killexams 000-748 Practice test | Killexams C2150-606 practice questions | Killexams 700-701 exam prep | Killexams 000-541 test questions | Killexams 000-910 study guide | Killexams Property-and-Casualty free pdf | Killexams LOT-956 real questions | Killexams VTNE cheat sheets | Killexams 1Z0-063 practice test | Killexams COG-112 brain dumps | Killexams CSWIP questions answers | Killexams HP0-J73 dumps | Killexams C9550-606 free pdf | Killexams P2090-050 study guide | Killexams PCNSE6 practice test | Killexams 1Z0-514 braindumps | Killexams COG-132 pdf download | Killexams 70-516-VB free pdf |

Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1

From Gold Bar to Joshua Tree | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Warning. A lot of climbing talk ahead.

The next morning, we woke up before 9, ate some cereal with mixed fruits, and headed out with some crash pads. Chad, Brooke, Josh, Wendy and I drove about 30 minutes out into the far desert and parked at the Hidden Valley Picnic Area parking lot (big mistake — there’s a parking lot at the Hidden Valley campsite literally across the street).

(Side note, I grew up in the high desert. It doesn’t look as stunning or beautiful as this.)

We got lost for a bit and took a long hike around from the west side but eventually found a VERY easy (listed) V1, that was honestly more like a V0 with a very short top out. Maybe we identified the boulder wrong.

Behind us was White Rastafarian. Keep in mind I have no fear doing any V2s at the gym. They’re usually require some technical moves but for the most part, they’re easily doable. White Rastafarian does not follow suit with that trend: the top-out of the boulder is 25 feet high and has a crux about 20 feet up that requires a span from one crack to another.

I ended up being able to make it to a juggy hold about halfway through the problem before I called it quits and decided not to risk injury.

After this, we headed to Pinhead a smallish boulder about 50 yards or so from White Rastafarian. This had a couple of great routes.

I was able to top out on this route, but due to my poor choice in footing, I slipped and fell, despite grabbing the juggy topout. I got a shallow scrape near my right thumb, and decided forfeit the route in the interest of taping it up and finding something easier. (I now regret not trying the route again after Chad and the others tried it.)

I was, however, able to complete the Pinhead Traverse (V0-).

Chad showed us this route that he found northeast of Pinhead. I’d put the gym grading as a V2 or maybe V2+, but outdoors, it’s likely a V0.

I didn’t try it — I wanted to save my energy for our last planned route for the day: Hobbit Hole Offwidth.

This offwidth boulder was tucked behind some brush and more rocks, and when we got there, Josh and Chad began to scramble up some surrounding rocks in the area. Wendy took a stab at Patina, a friction V1.I honestly had never really tried a friction climb, and the closest I’d seen at a climbing gym were labeled as VHards…

Hobbit Hole is obviously an “Offwidth” problem (see this video for reference on what the offwidth climb would look like), but I decided to do a lieback approach. I didn’t want to run the risk of slipping and jamming my body into the crack — I’ve seen 127 Hours and I’d rather not have a similar situation of getting stuck between two rocks.

This problem was a great learning experience, but I’ll just bundle in that lesson into the various other lessons I took away from that day’s climbing:1. Learn to move your feet alongside your hands. This is something that I often teach to newbie climbers and I needed to re-teach myself when climbing outdoors.2. Feel the rock before attempting to finish it. Unlike gym routes, the routes outdoors don’t have colored tape or markings designating where to go next. You can’t see that a hold is a sloper. A shelf or crack may not be consistently juggy throughout. This is also something that I tell new climbers when they send me pictures of a route asking, “What do I do next?” I can only speculate so much. The best remedy is to just go out there and try climbing the rock.3. Be prepared to make risky moves. I think this is a bit hypocritical on my part. On one hand, I promised myself that I wouldn’t injure myself outdoors as to not ruin my trip…but conversely I also realized that I would also prevent myself from performing moves that were either extremely painful, or performed an action that would require a quick recovery rather than a slow, systematic approach. It made me wonder — how do climbers really improve their grade at the gym? Do they just get strong enough (either through repetitive training or focused exercises) to complete higher grades with ease or do they actually experience the pain of making uncomfortable moves and just live with it? I think the right answer here is that it’s a balance of the two, but I’ve been ignoring the latter phenomena — when I reach an uncomfortable move, I often call it quits and then drop down and reassess. Is that what’s selling myself short? Do I fear a moment of pain of which I could possibly work through and see success beyond the horizon?

In the end, I feel like this boils down to a simple principle: remember your fundamentals. Of course, there are problems outdoors that can’t be easily re-created indoors, and there are different risks to take, but I felt that a lot of problem points that emerged when climbing outdoors simply stemmed from losing my cool and remembering my fundamentals even though it seemed like I was presented with a totally different context.

When we left the park that day, Wendy got several messages from her family and informed us that she needed to head back home for an emergency. As a matter of privacy, I’ll spare the details.

When we got home, we relaxed for a bit, and as the evening emerged, we had some pasta, sat around a fire pit, and chatted.A crescent moon appeared in the distance, under the stars, and above the silhouette of the mountains. It was honestly one of the most beautiful scenes I had ever witnessed, and unfortunately I don’t have a picture of it. All I can do is describe it with words and you’ll just have to believe me.

Later, Chad pointed out the International Space Station passing by, which was a bright light that emerged from the west and traveled in a line slowly to the east. Although it looked like nothing more than a steady star moving across the sky, it was exciting and we all chatted about it for quite some time.

Afterwards, Chad brought out his telescope and we got to see Jupiter and some star clusters. Wendy taught me how to take long-exposure night photographs, but the light pollution from town definitely caused the pictures to be less than perfect. I wish I could practice this more, but I didn’t bring a tripod, and also Seattle isn’t exactly primed for clear skies.

We went inside afterwards, then played some Monikers. Chad asked if I could throw together an improv DnD session while Wendy and Vincent called it a night.It was fun, and I wish I could do more sessions like that.

Why the Harper Majority is a Step Back for Science – Let Us Count the Ways | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

This is a guest post by David Ng, a science literacy academic at the Michael Smith Laboratories of the University of British Columbia.

In case you missed it, last night saw the Canada election deliver a Conservative majority. It was an interesting and historic vote for a variety of reasons, but the bottom line is that now the Harper government is in a position to do pretty much as it pleases, given its position of majority power in both the House of Commons and the Canadian Senate.

As is the norm for any democratic action, this is good and bad depending on your perspective and ideals. Those who make their homes in the business or economic front generally see the result as a positive; whereas those who value fairness, ethical government practices, and social issues tend to look upon the election as a daunting and frustrating setback. In this mix, however, is the scientific point of view. And speaking as a Canadian scientist, I want to use this space to make the case that all things being considered, this is a fundamentally bad moment in history for Canadian science.

To do this, let’s access how the Harper government (not the “Government of Canada” as it was once officially called) has performed so far (in the science context anyway).

And let’s argue for this in a rational way. We are after all scientific folk. In fact, let’s apply the good old rubric of looking at the claim, providing a reason, and then presenting the evidence for this stance.

First up is our claim: let’s just go with something direct:

The Harper Government is bad for Science.

As for coming up with a reason, it’s actually fairly straightforward. Here, we’ve seen repeated examples that would demonstrate a clear lack of understanding science culture, as well as actions that often undermine the very notion of scientific literacy. Sometimes, you get the sense that science just isn’t important to this government, and on occasion it even feels downright inconsequential.

But, of course, this wordy reason can’t stand on its own verbiage. We need concrete evidence for our claim, and to do this, it’s probably easiest to focus on a number of key points that demonstrate Harper’s modus operandi.

Point 1. The Harper government is not terribly scientifically literate.

There’s a few examples of this (also see point 2), but let’s simply draw attention to the appointment of a Minister of Industry, Science and Technology who waffles on the science of evolution. In case you don’t know his name, it’s Gary Goodyear: and in essence, his role in government is meant to be the primary driver on pushing and representing how science is funded, courted, guided, and basically done in Canada. Although an architect of many a cut to science funding in times that arguably need more scientific innovation (see 4 for more), he was and still is noted as a controversial figure when in 2009, the Globe and Mail asked him to share his stance regarding evolution. To this, he replied, “I’m a Christian, and I don’t think anybody asking a question about my religion is appropriate.”

Now from a scientific point of view, this type of statement is mildly troubling – you would hope that at least the Minister representing science would have more eloquent words to say on this subject. Unfortunately, this wasn’t the case as illustrated with his further comments on the matter when pressed again during a television interview. During this incident, he chose to proclaim his belief in evolution, but continued with this very odd and ludicrous description of what evolution is:

“We are evolving, every year, every decade. That’s a fact. Whether it’s to the intensity of the sun, whether it’s to, as a chiropractor, walking on cement versus anything else, whether it’s running shoes or high heels, of course, we are evolving to our environment.”

2. The Harper government has managed to make Climate Change science an ideological issue.

You’ve actually seen a lot of this already in American politics, but nowadays there’s also a Canadian version. Here’s how it works:

In general, science is fairly particular about the way it is done. The method is built to thrive on objectivity and it is ultimately based on the things we see, record, and analyze. It isn’t perfect, since the concept of a paradigm can exert influence, but the evidence it builds on still has to meet some pretty tough criteria – certainly much more stringent than other epistemologies, or other ways of knowing. Put another way, scientific evidence is not suppose to be swayed by ideological or partisan lines.

Despite this, Harper’s politics have warped the science of climate change into one of partisan debate. All other Canadian political parties take the science at face value, and build from it. Not so with the Conservatives. This is inherently disrespectful to the scientific community, as it suggests that we can make decisions concerning climate change in a place where scientific literacy has no currency, whereby the overwhelming scientific consensus is treated as nothing more than an interesting and suspicious footnote.

As a result, Harper runs the country on the pretense of whether one can trust or distrust the scientific evidence, without actually debating the actual technical strengths and weaknesses of the climate science data currently presented. Harper runs the country based on messages that economically sound promising, but are environmentally unsustainable, and have strong repercussions which conveniently will take form long after he is retired. Above all, he places an emphasis on nurturing a subtle form of climate change denialism and has made it part of the conservative ideology. From a scientist’s point of view, this is probably not the best way to formulate important policies – on “feelings” as oppose to concrete evidence. In essence, we can say that I may not be a betting man: but if I was, I’m pretty sure that the scientific community is the best place to get our odds.

Now, one might argue that this is not Harper’s stance at all. It would appear that the official take would proclaim the government’s official backing of the “fundamentals of climate change science.” However, as always is the case, actions speak louder than words. As evidence of this, you only need to keep track of the Harper’s record on climate change. Since obtaining its first minority government in 2006, the Conservatives have essentially moved away from Canada’s commitment to Kyoto, and has repeatedly undermine climate change talks (to the point of being consistent winners of the “Fossil of the Day” award), part of which involves the continual setting up of disappointing emission targets.

In 2009 the goal was to cut carbon emissions by 20% below 2006 levels by 2020; an equivalent of 3% below 1990 levels by 2020. The goal was later changed in early 2010 to 17% of 2005 levels by 2020; an equivalent of 2.5% above 1990 levels.

The three most populous provinces disagree with the federal government goal and announced more ambitious targets on their jurisdictions. Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia announced respectively 20%, 15% and 14% reduction target below their 1990 levels while Alberta is expecting a 58% increase in emissions. (Wikipedia, April 2011)

More troubling, is that Harper appears to not have any qualms about pushing his agenda in any way possible, and does so in a way that draws clear distinctions between party lines. In particular, is his flagrant misuse of Senate power to go against the democratic passing of a Climate Change Bill (Bill C-311).

Here, a quick lesson in Canadian government procedures might help. Essentially, when Canadian laws or Bills are put on the table, they need to go through a vote in the House of Commons. This is represented by elected members of government, such that the voting here is inherently meant to represent the “will of the people.” However, if passed, the law then needs to go through the Canadian Senate. This level of government is suppose to reflect a place of “sober second thought,” but historically, the Senate very rarely goes against the decisions made in the House of Commons. This is because Senate members are appointed, and therefore in principle are there to still respect the democratic underpinning of the House of Commons’ vote. However, in December 2008, Harper filled 18 vacant Senate spots with Conservative appointments, and has used this Senate majority in undemocratic ways – including the killing of the Climate Change Bill.

Still, there are other ways to force an ideology along: which brings us to point number three.

3. The Harper government has demonstrated a willingness to “muzzle” science.

In 2010, the release of Environment Canada documents showed that new media rules introduced by the Harper Government in 2007, with the aim to control the ability for Federal climate scientists to interact with media, had been responsible for what many of these scientists have called a “muzzling” effect.

“Scientists have noticed a major reduction in the number of requests, particularly from high profile media, who often have same-day deadlines,” said the Environment Canada document. “Media coverage of climate change science, our most high-profile issue, has been reduced by over 80 per cent.”

The analysis reviewed the impact of a new federal communications policy at Environment Canada, which required senior federal scientists to seek permission from the government prior to giving interviews.

The document suggests the new communications policy has practically eliminated senior federal scientists from media coverage of climate-change science issues, leaving them frustrated that the government was trying to “muzzle” them. (Montreal Gazette, March 15, 2010)

This facet of Harper’s strategy is especially troubling. Science, as a whole, is a venture that best works when there is fluidity and an openness in how information is shared. Whether that is within the scientific community in the form of expert peer review, or back and forth between scientists and the general public or the policy makers as a dialogue of civic consequence, there is simply no commendable reason for this form of control. It should be obvious that discussions on Climate Change, which has obvious public importance, things shouldn’t be run like a corporation protecting its secrets and/or hiding information that veers away from the desired message.

4. The Harper Government is out of touch with science culture: scientists are driven by many things, and not always by the industry/business/corporate mentality.

Over the last couple years, we’ve seen examples where the Harper Government has consistently pushed research towards a heavy emphasis for applied sciences and industry, often at the expense of basic science. Whether this is via funding cuts to granting agencies such as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (a bastion of basic science research), diverting such monies towards projects where business-related objectives are encouraged, or via restructuring of the National Research Council such that industry-related projects are given priorities, there’s definitely a method to his ways. Overall, this indicates a general ignorance of how scientific progress works – that is, it is almost always the discoveries born from basic research that fuel the future innovation necessary for applied benefits. Put another way, if Harper continues on this track to give himself quick political gain, he does so at the expense of future Canadian science. Even a small lull in basic research in the present could result in a significant lull in applied and economic potentials in the future.

As well, this constant patronage towards the business side of science also doesn’t necessarily reflect the intentions of the scientists themselves. Money and economics may be desirable things for scientists, but most often there are other stronger motivations at stake – including an aspiration to bring about positive change in the world, as well as plain old intellectual curiosity.

An example of Harper’s willingness to always give credence to the corporate line, is his Government’s poor handling of the recently diposed Bill C-393. Essentially, this is an episode where bad politics trumped good science. The good science in this case is the fact that there are very effective antiretroviral drug out there, which make HIV/AIDS a treatable disorder. Unfortunately, these are mostly priced too high for individuals in developing countries – countries where unnecessary death from HIV/AIDS is catastrophically high. The bad politics concerns a frustrating series of events that saw a Bill (C-393), designed to fairly and with monitoring facilitate production of generic drugs, get passed in the House of Commons (i.e. democratically given the green light); then was taken to Senate, where it was deliberately stalled for five days, in an atmosphere where misleading information provided by the pharmaceutical industry was being distributed to the Tory Senators; such that it was ultimately killed by default when the new election was called. The fact that the reason for this was ultimately because of the Harper’s Government willingness to patronize Big Pharma is extremely galling, especially when so many lives were literally at stake.

Conclusion

It’s important to note that science culture isn’t the only thing that drives a civil society. However, as a conduit for reasoned discourse and relevant information that affects local and global concerns, it’s obvious that science must not be taken for granted. Based on last night’s election results, we have every reason to worry about the Conservative majority, as the Harper Government has repeatedly demonstrated past activities that not only take science for granted, but treat it with a form of contempt. The Harper government has consistently ignored whatever sound utility the scientific endeavor can provide, and by doing so, has put the future of Canadian science at risk, as well as the elements of society that would have otherwise benefited from it.

In the end, this means that we must watch the actions of this Harper Government more closely; and to be vocal, to be active, and to do our best to hold them to account for their actions. Democracy has given Harper a mandate to govern as he sees fit, and for this there should be an element of respect as well as an element of opportunity. However, Harper should not forget that Canadian democracy is ultimately driven by the people of Canada. For that reason, I will be watching you closely. Scientists will be watching you closely. Canadians will be watching you closely.

David Ng is a science literacy academic at the Michael Smith Laboratories of the University of British Columbia. He has written essays for the Walrus, humour for McSweeney’s, commentary for Boingboing, and is now trying to learn more about Access to Medicine issues at the My Rights Versus Yours Blog. You can follow him on twitter @dnghub. If you’re a Canadian reader, he also encourages you to check out aidsaction.ca to note that almost all conservatives still align themselves with Big Pharma’s stance on Access to Medicine issues. Why not send them an email to make sure they know exactly how you feel?

Ask HN: Why is everything in JavaScript changing so fast? | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

If a bank/credit union/etc doesn't have a native app in 2016, I doubt they have a web app that's usable on a phone either.

> A native app for each news site I read

Right, because RSS readers and aggregators aren't totally a thing.

> A native app for every social media site

Those literally exist today.

> A native app for all the map searches, directions, etc. we all use

You realise you don't need a new app for each search you want to do? I don't even understand this premise.

> Security updates? Nightmare

Right, because having half-baked web-apps with millions of user's personal data all stuck in a big fat juicy database in one spot, just waiting to be breached and spread like herpes in a brothel has worked out so fucking well.

Every major mobile platform and the two leading commercial desktop platforms have app store infrastructure which provide automatic updates of client-installed apps.

> Multi-OS support? forget about it.

Right, because no app ever has been developed cross platform, and every web app ever created works perfectly in every browser with zero effort from the developer.

> We'd all be back to a Windows monopoly.

Wat.

Edit: additionally, a number of the things you describe, i.e. news sites, aren't web-apps in the way most people think. They offer very limited if any interaction or functionality for the user except navigating to find/read other news content, and possibly leave feedback. Those sorts of things are what the web excels at, because they're essentially used for one-way content viewing.

And then everyone started to build "rich" web applications (it is called differently every year), with the "best" tool existing. I personally see two major problems – usually cool startups who can afford using the bleeding edge will die soon (or will get enough money to completely rewrite it), so 'maintanence' in idiomatic way doesn't work here – life cycle is extremely small, and it reflects in the way libraries are written in JavaScript. Also, the barrier is low, and therefore we have a lot of complex websites built by novices, running in development mode in the actual production.

Community also is very "poisoned" with the idea that you _have_ to work in your evenings (contributing to OSS, writing your own or just playing with hot technologies), and therefore new stuff is baked extremely quickly. It is usually very low quality, and you have to cope a lot in order to make it work, and often you have to dive into source code, and it is considered as normal, which is quite sick from my point of view.

Also, it is truly "hype" community, which is super excited about what is hot now – and it means that today kings will be overthrown very soon (right now stuff like Cycle.js and Vue.js is gaining traction). Nobody wants to maintain their libraries – and very often you can see projects with a lot of stars completely abandoned.

Recently, Babel.js was defined as _defacto_ standard, and it basically started transpiling era, which is not going to end in the foreseeable future. It shakes the stability, and makes extremely easy to add new features (like stage-0), and people just used to unrealiable tools.

So, all of this works as a snowball, which only speeds up. People create more and more complex web applications, and also js is going into other fields (like microcontrollers, Node.js grows in popularity, React Native is super hot now). When it will stop? Nobody knows. Maybe WebAssembly after implementing will stop it (people will spread over competing technologies), maybe no.

I think it based on two factors:

1. the size of the community, JavaScript popularity is huge, it's probably the biggest programming community in the world, even the not so popular frameworks have a bigger community then the biggest frameworks in other popular languages (as a not at all accurate measurement, see vue.js and Python's django github stars/followers).

If you look at js frameworks/methodologies/libraries compared to the sum of the other languages' frameworks then the pace of change in Javascript compared to how many people use it is not as bad.

I had a similar experience with Java when it was the king of the web frameworks - JSP, JSX, JSF, Spring MVC, Struts, Stripe, Wicket and a dozen others.

Java was big enough to contain all of these frameworks, and it was big enough for people to support new ideas rather then iterate on existing ones.

I'm not familiar with C/C++ enough, but I think it has a similar amount of change to Java (which is somewhat less the JS)

2. the other big factor is how decentralized it is - JS is extremely decentralized, there are tons of big organizations contributing to it's advancement, to frameworks even building their own compilers (all the browsers).

Java is very similar in this regard, even in their governing model (a collection of companies that decide on standards together, though Java has drifted from that model with Oracle's lead lately).

C# is the opposite, it's one of the biggest languages but doesn't have a lot of change in it - everything is dictated by the central authority (Microsoft) and competing frameworks that don't get popular enough.

There are other factors of course, but I think most of those can be seen in other languages with less change, and are less relevant overall.

Which completely misses the point, this is called a file system btw, but a SQL Databases is designed from the ground up to have a validation schema.

You simply cannot put data in a SQL database that is not conform to the schema on which the table is defined. You can't simply put a string into an int column but this also means that any data you may read from this column will always be an int no matter what.

It means that if your transaction completes, including large scale database upgrades, at no point where types violated and you can be sure that all data is valid (or deleted because you forgot the WHERE clause)

>In ES6 you can now go very low level and deal with raw bit buffers.

I doubt you can write to registers and manipulate memory allocation, that is actually low level.

Manipulating bits is something every turing machine emulator can do.

>My problem with Go and other languages is that you have to be verbose like str = string = "string";

Which shows me that you haven't bothered to actually look into any statically typed language because I know of no common language that uses this syntax.

Go actually infers the type if possible, you simply write `str := "string"` or `var str = "string"` and go will use the correct type.

You can do this even with complex objects no problem. You only need to define the type if it's non-obvious, like you want to use an interface but the assignment uses the raw type, but this is something now compiler can do (it would be guess work)

Furthermore, there is no sacrifice in productivity, actually the opposite.

You don't have to wonder if the parameters you receive will have the correct type. If your function signature is `func (int) int` you can only ever receive an integer and you can only ever return an integer.

>NodeJS (commonJS) module system that makes it possible to not write complexed code, because it's lexically scoped and do not have hidden globals.

Go actually has a very neat module system. It's rather simple; all uppercase fields and funcs are exported, everything else is private.

The architecture of the standard library in Go and the language itself discourage globals and encourage default global states which can be exchanged for user defined states seamlessly.

Check out logrus or any of the popular logging frameworks in go. You can either use the default logger which is globally exposed or you use a custom one and pass the variable.

>I'm willing to sacrifice that for increased productivity and simplicity.

If simplicity and productivity is your goal you should use one of the LISP variants like ClojureScript. Nothing beats a language which you can program to be more efficient for you.

And you probably should check out some Go code too, it's easy to understand even without knowledge of the language as long as you know some basic CS101 stuff.

Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

References :

Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/c2010-659
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11723375
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1jK
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12294714
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/people-used-these-ibm-dumps-to-get-100_23.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/JustMemorizeTheseC2010-659QuestionsBeforeYouGoForTest
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/xecttre1u46svjbe0yfbek84vjk13wl1
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/where-can-i-get-help-to-pass-c2010-659-exam killexams.com helps millions of candidates pass the exams and get their certifications. We have thousands of successful reviews. Our dumps are reliable, affordable, updated and of really best quality to overcome the difficulties of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are latest updated in highly outclass manner on regular basis and material is released periodically. Latest killexams.com dumps are available in testing centers with whom we are maintaining our relationship to get latest material. The killexams.com exam questions for C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam is mainly based on two accessible formats, PDF and Practice questions. PDF file carries all the exam questions, answers which makes your preparation easier. While the Practice questions are the complimentary feature in the exam product. Which helps to self-assess your progress. The evaluation tool also highlights your weak areas, where you need to put more efforts so that you can improve all your concerns. Killexams.com recommend you to must try its free demo, you will notice the intuitive UI and also you will find it very easy to customize the preparation mode. But make sure that, the real C2010-659 product has more features than the trial version. If, you are contented with its demo then you can purchase the actual C2010-659 exam product. Avail 3 months Free updates upon purchase of C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 Exam questions. killexams.com offers you three months free update upon acquisition of C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam questions. Our expert team is always available at back end who updates the content as and when required. Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99 DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders Source / Reference: https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/c2010-659 http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11723375 http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1jK http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12294714 http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/people-used-these-ibm-dumps-to-get-100_23.html http://feeds.feedburner.com/JustMemorizeTheseC2010-659QuestionsBeforeYouGoForTest https://app.box.com/s/xecttre1u46svjbe0yfbek84vjk13wl1
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5xmi625ce05221f214b3a9ce4cc62e02dd8c9