|Exam Name||:||Avaya Aura(TM) Session Manager and System Manager|
|Questions and Answers||:||72 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||December 13, 2017|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||6001-1 Brain Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure 6001-1 Full Version|
Subnet network mask
Network Time Protocol (NTP) settings
Default Gateway IP
Which statement is true, when SIP Monitoring is enabled on a SIP Entity?
Session Manager will monitor the status of that SIP Entity by sending SIP OPTIONS requests
SIP Entity will monitor the status of Session Manager by sending SIP OPTIONS requests
Session Manager will monitor the status of that SIP Entity by sending SIP SUBSCRIBE requests
Session Manager will monitor the status of that SIP Entity by sending SIP NOTIFY requests
In which configuration does Avaya recommend arranging multiple Session Manager instances for optimal redundancy
A technician is asked with creating a set of Routing Policies for the organization
A SIP entity must be specified as destination and as an origination point. You must provide the tines of day that the policy applies, and a dial pattem or regular expression that the call URI must match
The destination SIP entity can either be chosen specifically, or it may be selected implicitly using a matching expression Multiple times of day the policy is active can be chosen. The policy must have either a dial pattem or regular expression
A routing policy MUST specify a SIP entity as a destination, and also a dial pattem which the called party in the SIP message is matched against. Inclusion of a time range, or time range, or regular expression, is optional but recommended since it makes the policy more specific
A SIP entity must be specified as an end point, the times of day that the policy applies must be provided, either a dial pattem or regular expression for the policy must be provided
Which two wildcard characters does Session Manager allow to be used to specify a location? (Choose two)
E. “$” (dollar)
Avaya products ensure that authentication credentials and file transfers are protected when sent across the network by using which three methods? (Choose three)
Secure Shell (SSH)
Secure Copy (SCP) E. HTTP
A new feature has been deployed in the network, It must be applied to ALL calls made and received by employee Jane Smith A technician has been asked to make the necessary arrangements Alter adding a SIP Entity and Entity Link, which sequence describes the next steps that should be taken?
Navigate to Jane’s User Profile and open the Session Manager Profile From the Originating Application Sequence drop down list, select the new Application Sequence Do the same with the Terminating Application Sequence drop down list mark them both as being Mandatory
Define the new feature as an Application Add the Application to an Application Sequence, Mark the Application Sequence as Mandatory Add the Application Sequence to Jane’ User Profile
Create a new Application Sequence or edit one that already exists, Add details of the new feature to the Application Sequence, Mark the new feature as being mandatory Apply the Application Sequence to Jane’s Originating and Terminating Application Sequences in her Session Manager Profile
Define a new Application that details the new feature. Add the new Application to an Application Sequence, Apply the Application Sequence to both ORIGINATING AND Terminating Application Sequences in Jane’s Session Manager Profile
Which role do the Call Admission Control (CAC) parameters play in Session Manager?
They prevent some into subscription of VoIP networks by applying CAC to media traffic, not signaling traffic
They prevent under subscription of VoIP networks by applying CAC to signaling traffic, not media traffic
They prevent over subscription of VoIP networks by applying CAC to signaling traffic, not media traffic
They prevent over subscription of VoIP networks by applying CAC to media traffic, not signaling traffic
They prevent under subscription of VoIP networks by applying CAC to media traffic, not signaling traffic
Which statement describes the relationship between System Manager and System Platform?
System Platform hosts System Manager
System Platform provides access to System Manager’s data repositories
System Manager is the User Interface through which System Platform is administered
System Manager and System Platform are peer applications. Both installed on Avaya S8800 servers
Which component of the Communication Profile can be changed by modifying a user via Communication Profile Edition?
Session Manager Profile
The Indraprastha university typical Entrance test is an entrance exam conducted by using Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha university, for admission to Lateral Entry to B.Tech application for B.Sc graduates. The examination may be carried out on might also four, 2013.
Eligibility criteria for IPU-CET Lateral Entry to B.Tech (for B.Sc Graduates) 2013:
Editor: Greg A. Fairbanks, J.D., LL.M.
credits in opposition t Tax
In conception, the analysis and construction (R&D) tax credit is an excellent incentive for the greater than 18,000 taxpayers who declare credit each yr. definitely, the R&D credit score is among the few tax breaks that has consistent bipartisan support—President Barack Obama lately joined with congressional leaders in calling for the enactment of a permanent R&D credit. however, really, the motivation impact of the R&D credit has been severely dampened with the aid of the incontrovertible fact that defending the credit score right through an IRS audit will also be a long and irritating system for taxpayers. over the last few years, many taxpayers that boost new products, employ degreed scientists and/or engineers, and habits laboratory trying out had been shocked to hear the IRS exam teams conclude that these activities don't qualify for the R&D credit score. How did reality and idea become so different?
There are a few indistinct and subjective terms in the body of the R&D tax credit legislation which are interpreted very otherwise through taxpayers, the courts, and the IRS. most likely probably the most fashionable present disagreement is over the time period “enough documentation” and how to accurately substantiate the credit score.background
There are not any particular recordkeeping necessities for the R&D credit aside from what's present in Regs. Sec. 1.forty one-4(d)(four): “A taxpayer claiming the credit score under section 41 ought to maintain statistics in sufficiently usable kind and aspect to substantiate that the bills claimed are eligible for the credit. For suggestions governing list retention, see §1.6001-1.” Regs. Sec. 1.6001-1 does not supply lots additional detail, aside from declaring that the taxpayer “shall keep such permanent books of account or facts . . . as are enough to establish the quantity of . . . credits.” as a consequence, the governing statutory rule, Sec. 6001, and the linked rules require handiest that the taxpayer retain everlasting facts enough to set up the quantity of the credit score.
additional, when the R&D credit score turned into extended in 1999, Congress made it clear that claiming the credit score should still now not impose unreasonable recordkeeping requirements: “The conferees are also worried about unnecessary and costly taxpayer record retaining burdens and reaffirm that eligibility for the credit is not intended to be contingent on meeting unreasonable recordkeeping necessities” (see H.R. Conf. Rep’t, No. 106-478 at 132 (1999)). in a similar way, in the preamble to December 2001 proposed laws, Treasury and the IRS concluded that “taxpayers should be supplied cost effective flexibility within the method by which they substantiate their analysis credits” (REG-112991-01).
in spite of this, taxpayers in examination often come across rigid IRS brokers requesting immense quantities of information and documentation; this concern turned into simplest magnified when R&D credit score claims had been certain as a large enterprise and foreign (LB&I) Division Tier I concern in 2007. The Tier I reputation indicates that the R&D credit is an argument the IRS views as considered one of its optimum strategic priorities. since the credit’s designation as a Tier I issue, taxpayers have commonly experienced complex and drawn-out examinations of their R&D credit claims.The IRS’s place: Lack of Nexus
The IRS has made its place on substantiation clear through the free up of the regular substantiation write-up blanketed as reveal E of its analysis credit Claims Audit options guide (RCCATG) (LMSB-04-0508-030) released in 2008. This common write-up, intended for use as an aid in drafting profits agent experiences (RAR) for disallowing R&D credit claims, provides perception into the IRS’s thinking about substantiation. The argument covered within the common write-up and sometimes viewed in specific RARs is that the “[t]axpayer has did not deliver adequate substantiation to help the quantity of its claimed credit score.” regularly the crux of the IRS’s argument is as follows (as articulated within the regular write-up): “Taxpayer’s estimation methodology faces an insurmountable problem as it lacks a nexus between the ‘quantities’ claimed as certified analysis prices [QRE] pursuant to IRC §forty one(b) and the ‘actions’ claimed as allegedly certified. . . . There is not any link between the quantity of analysis claimed to have been performed by means of an worker and the tasks which allegedly resulted in alleged research recreation.”
This lack of nexus difficulty is additional mentioned broadly speaking body of the RCCATG: “The manner in which the assistance is compiled typically doesn't aid the relationship between the accounting records and the research activities or QREs.” A separate Appeals coordinated situation paper released in April 2007 echoes these equal arguments (see qualified research, Sec. 41(d) (research credit) and linked Penalties, as elevated, 2007 TNT sixty nine-6 (April 10, 2007)). The IRS takes difficulty when taxpayers use the Cohan rule to estimate QREs when excellent statistics do not exist (see Cohan, 39 F.second 540 (second Cir. 1930)). When taxpayers try and set up the nexus between certified actions and QREs through the use of applicable estimation and/or oral testimony, the IRS typically argues that any use of these strategies is grounds for disallowing the credit.contemporary court docket suggestions
several contemporary courtroom circumstances deal at once with the challenge of substantiation and the applicable use of estimation by means of taxpayers claiming the R&D credit. In Union Carbide, T.C. Memo. 2009-50, the Tax courtroom ruled on no matter if R&D activities and associated QREs claimed for tasks carried out at the taxpayer’s manufacturing amenities were eligible for the credit. In its ruling, the court found that two of the five initiatives at challenge constituted certified analysis; although, it did not allow the supply QREs claimed for these tasks. peculiarly, the court supported using the Cohan rule in making a choice on a “shut approximation” of QREs via interviews and oral testimony corroborated by way of documentary proof. extra, the court docket found that credible oral testimony “sufficiently substantiated the wages paid” to definite employees—on one mission, wages have been decided by using estimated hours to compute qualified research percentages.
an extra fresh court resolution, McFerrin, 570 F.3d 672 (fifth Cir. 2009), discusses substantiation of the R&D credit score. McFerrin dealt with a group of agencies that manufactured, saved, and purified chemicals. The common district court case turned into decided in 2008, when the district courtroom disallowed all credit claimed in response to lack of substantiation (McFerrin, No. H-05-3730 (S.D. Tex. 5/25/08)). In June 2009, the courtroom of Appeals vacated the long-established determination for a few factors, together with the undeniable fact that the district court docket failed to trust all primary facts. The court docket of Appeals ruled that if the taxpayer incurred qualified expenses, the court docket should still use the Cohan rule to estimate the quantity of allowable credit score. The court docket of Appeals principally brought up that “the court docket should still seem to be to testimony and different evidence, including the institutional competencies of personnel, in opting for a fair estimate.”
In Trinity Industries Inc., 691 F. Supp. 2d 688 (N.D. Tex. 2010), the courtroom regarded even if a taxpayer in the company of shipbuilding conducted certified analysis and incurred QREs. The qualification of actions within the case changed into in keeping with testimony and displays provided by Trinity. The court docket found that two of the six projects claimed had been certified; despite the fact, as a part of its ruling it stated here: “The courtroom is aware of case legislations instructing it to estimate the amount of QRE if it determines that the taxpayer has made some qualified expenditure. . . . in this case, however, Trinity did not present any proof from which the courtroom could make a significant estimate.” it's important that taxpayers have satisfactory tips and proof with a purpose to make an affordable estimate.
These contemporary court choices add to the body of case legislation obtainable to aid taxpayers take into account a way to accurately substantiate their R&D credit (see Allen, T.C. Memo. 1988-166; Fudim, T.C. Memo. 1994-235; and Eustace, 312 F.3d 905 (seventh Cir. 2002)).looking forward
The disagreement between the IRS and taxpayers about how to accurately substantiate R&D credit has resulted in a major backlog of R&D credit situations at each the box exam and Appeals ranges. The authors are aware that senior leaders of the LB&I Division are actively working with taxpayers and examination leaders to resolve a whole lot of this battle. The intention of this initiative is to listen to input and discover the right way to increase the R&D credit score substantiation and examination strategies. This fresh building offers renewed hope that the IRS is dedicated to working with taxpayers to bridge the existing divide about how to properly substantiate the R&D credit score.
so as to be certain the maximum feasible opportunity of success on exam, taxpayers may still depend on the choicest accessible documentation to aid the QREs protected in their R&D credit score claims. on account that the IRS will challenge any reliance on estimation or oral testimony upon examination, taxpayers may still be certain to collect and continue documentary facts to corroborate any estimates used. Taxpayers claiming the R&D credit score may still consult with their tax adviser to check how they can enrich their R&D credit score documentation.
Greg Fairbanks is a tax senior supervisor with grant Thornton LLP in Washington, DC.
For additional information about these items, contact Mr. Fairbanks at (202) 521-1503 or email@example.com.
except otherwise noted, contributors are participants of or linked to furnish Thornton LLP.
Date of concern: 2015-11-26
software: This DAOD is a directive that applies to personnel of the department of countrywide Defence (DND personnel) and an order that applies to officers and non-commissioned individuals of the Canadian armed forces (CAF contributors).
Approval Authority: Assistant Deputy Minister (suggestions administration) (ADM(IM))
Enquiries: Director assistance management safety (DIM Secur)2. Definitions
The technique of conducting an unbiased evaluation and examination of system statistics and actions so as to examine for adequacy of system controls, to be sure compliance with dependent coverage and operational methods, and to recommend any indicated changes in controls, coverage, or methods. (Defence Terminology bank list number 27493)
counsel technology (technologies de l’tips)
involves both technology infrastructure and IT purposes. know-how infrastructure contains any gadget or equipment that is used within the automated acquisition, storage, manipulation, management, circulate, control, monitor, switching, interchange, transmission or reception of records or guidance. IT functions consist of all concerns involved with the design, development, setting up and implementation of suggestions programs and applications to satisfy business necessities. (Directive on management of tips know-how, Treasury Board)
The continual system of staring at the operations of assistance techniques with the purpose of detecting deviations from deliberate or anticipated behaviour. (ITSG-33, IT protection possibility management: A Lifecycle strategy, communique protection establishment Canada)
operational authority (autorité opérationnelle)
The person who has the authority to define requirements and working ideas, set standards and settle for risk within their area of accountability. (Defence Terminology financial institution listing number 43435)
safety authority (autorité de sécurité)
The grownup who has the authority to establish possibility, deliver tips and safety standards for endorsement via the operational authority and technical authority, and video display compliance inside their area of responsibility. (Defence Terminology bank checklist quantity 43436)
technical authority (autorité approach)
The person who has the authority to set technical necessities and requirements, control configurations, supply technical counsel and computer screen compliance inside their area of responsibility. (Defence Terminology financial institution list quantity 43437)three. assessmentContext
3.1 Monitoring and auditing are required to maintain and offer protection to important assistance know-how (IT) infrastructure, methods and features. in accordance with the Treasury Board Directive on Departmental protection management and the Operational safety usual: management of tips know-how safety (MITS), the DND and the CAF are required to make certain that:
3.2 This DAOD should still be examine along side the DND and CF IM and IT policy Framework and other primary ADM(IM) policies, guidelines, directives, requisites and suggestions.goals
3.3 The targets of this DAOD are to:
three.four The anticipated effects of this DAOD are:
4.1 The monitoring of IT systems is completed via a mixture of technical tools and administrative approaches. Operational authorities (OAs) should ensure that:
4.2 moreover, continual, automatic, real-time, incident detection equipment ought to be carried out for all high-possibility systems. high-chance techniques are those techniques whose compromise will at once jeopardize essential DND company activities or CAF operations.Audit Logs
4.3 extraordinary movements that ensue all over the operation of an IT system should be recorded in an audit log for further analysis.
four.four Audit logs are critical for settling on and resolving IT safety incidents and for holding particular person clients dependable for his or her movements. Audit log entries need to be:
4.5 Audit logs can also be important sources of facts during prison complaints. To make certain that the cost of audit logs as proof isn't compromised, DND employees and CAF members must now not modify audit logs once they have been created.
4.6 Audit logs are tips components of business price and are hence field to the retention necessities set out in DAOD 6001-1, Recordkeeping. For greater specified counsel on retention requirements for audit logs, see fundamental quantity 2102 (safety – assistance systems) in the Defence subject Classification and Disposition device (DSCDS).IT protection manage Monitoring
four.7 IT security control monitoring is required to be sure that controls characteristic correctly in order to quite simply shelter the belongings that they're supposed to give protection to. See DAOD 6003-2, suggestions technology security risk management, for more counsel.IT system safety Self-assessment
4.8 In aid of the ongoing protection of IT techniques, OAs must ensure that all programs inside their enviornment of responsibility have their protection continually reviewed and self-assessed, and that the effects are stated to the DIM Secur.
four.9 OAs ought to contact the DIM Secur for particulars on the self-evaluation methodology.Oversight and Compliance
four.10 besides the monitoring and auditing requirements described above, the DIM Secur might also conduct oversight and compliance actions on selected IT programs. These actions may encompass stories and assessments of audit reports if warranted by way of IT security hobbies or IT protection incidents, or in keeping with OA concerns.privateness
four.11 IT security monitoring and auditing are subject to the provisions of the privacy Act. within the conduct of monitoring and auditing of IT protection, DND personnel and CAF individuals have to additionally comply with all executive of Canada (GC), DND and CAF guidelines, guidance, directives and requisites in admire of the privacy of DND employees and CAF members.5. consequences penalties of Non-Compliance
5.1 Non-compliance with this DAOD might also have penalties for each the DND and the CAF as associations, and for DND employees and CAF individuals as people. Suspected non-compliance may be investigated. the character and severity of the consequences on account of genuine non-compliance will be commensurate with the situations of the non-compliance.
notice – In admire of the compliance of DND employees, see the Treasury Board Framework for the management of Compliance for more information.6. household tasksResponsibility table
6.1 the following table identifies the obligations linked to this DAOD:The ... is or are accountable for ... DIM Secur
Unformatted text preview: To check the change of the capacity, we first discover the levels of freedom v = 13 when circular up. also, t = 7 . 95 10 . 26 1 . 10 2 / 10+0 . 57 2 / 10 = 5 . 90 with a P-value < . 0005. choice: Reject H ; there's a big change in the steel rods. 10.113 n 1 = n 2 = 10, x 1 = 21 . 5, s 1 = 5 . 3177, x 2 = 28 . 3 and s 2 = 5 . 8699. considering that f = s 2 1 s 2 2 = . 8207 and f . 05 (9 , 9) = three . 18, we conclude that the two variances are equal. s p = 5 . 6001 and hence t = 21 . 5 28 . three (5 . 6001) 1 / 10+1 / 10 = 2 . seventy one with 0 . 005 < P-price < . 0075. resolution: Reject H ; the excessive earnings neighborhood produces drastically more wastew-ater to be treated. 10.114 n 1 = n 2 = 16, x 1 = 48 . 1875, s 1 = 4 . 9962, x 2 = 43 . 7500 and s 2 = 4 . 6833. due to the fact f = s 2 1 s 2 2 = 1 . 1381 and f . 05 (15 , 15) = 2 . 40, we conclude that the two variances are equal. s p = 4 . 8423 and therefore t = forty eight . 1875 forty three . 7500 (four . 8423) 1 / sixteen+1 / 16 = 2 . fifty nine. here's a two-sided test. since . 005 < P ( T > 2 . 59) < . 0075, we now have 0 . 01 < P-price < . 015. decision: Reject H ; there's a big change within the number of defects. 10.one hundred fifteen The hypotheses are: H : = 24 10 four gm , H 1 : < 24 10 four gm . t = 22 . 8 24 four . 8 / 50 = 1 . seventy seven with 0 . 025 < P-price < . 05. therefore, at value level of = 0 . 05, the suggest concentration of PCB in malignant breast tissue is less than 24 10 four gm. Chapter 11 primary Linear Regression and Correlation eleven.1 (a) i x i = 778 . 7, i y i = 2050 . 0, i x 2 i = 26 , 591 . sixty three, i x i y i = 65 , 164 . 04, n = 25. hence, b = (25)(65 , 164 . 04) (778 . 7)(2050 . 0) (25)(26 , 591 . sixty three) (778 . 7) 2 = 0 . 5609 , a = 2050 (0 . 5609)(778 . 7) 25 = 64 . fifty three . (b) using the equation y = 64 . 53 + 0 . 5609 x with x = 30, we locate y = sixty four . 53 + (0 . 5609)(30) = eighty one . 40. (c) Residuals appear to be random as desired. 10 20 30 40 50 60-30-20-10 10 20 30 Arm power Residual 11.2 (a) i x i = 707, i y i = 658, i x 2 i = fifty seven , 557, i x i y i = 53 , 258, n = 9. b = (9)(fifty three , 258) (707)(658) (9)(fifty seven , 557) (707) 2 = 0 . 7771 , a = 658 (0 . 7771)(707) 9 = 12 . 0623 . 149 one hundred fifty Chapter eleven essential Linear Regression and Correlation therefore y = 12 . 0623 + 0 . 7771 x . (b) For x = 85, y = 12 . 0623 + (0 . 7771)(eighty five) = 78. 11.3 (a) i x i = 16 . 5, i y i = a hundred . 4, i x 2 i = 25 . eighty five, i x i y i = 152 . fifty nine, n = 11. for this reason, b = (eleven)(152 . fifty nine) (16 . 5)(100 . 4) (eleven)(25 . eighty five) (sixteen . 5) 2 = 1 . 8091 , a = a hundred . four (1 . 8091)(16 . 5) eleven = 6 . 4136 . therefore y = 6 . 4136 + 1 . 8091 x (b) For x = 1 . seventy five, y = 6 . 4136 + (1 . 8091)(1 . 75) = 9 . 580....View Full document