IBM Infrastructure Virtualization/Business(R) Resilience Tech

IBM manager: Cyber-resilience method a part of company continuity | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

in case your firm would not have a cyber-resilience method for company continuity, it should get one.

Andrea Sayles, usual supervisor of IBM business Resiliency features, stated she has discovered companies in popular are considering in regards to the "when," not the "if," involving a possible cyberattack.

"or not it's on the properly of mind for each C-suite executive that I seek advice from," Sayles mentioned in a lower back as much as basics podcast about cyber-resilience approach and other IT resiliency concerns. "all of them want to talk about it. They are looking to keep in mind the capabilities and what functions and offerings are out in the marketplace these days."

Sayles pointed out it be important to differentiate between cybersecurity and cyber resilience. Cybersecurity specializes in attaining the security pursuits of confidentiality, integrity and availability. Cyber resilience focuses on the ability to face up to and recover from a cyberattack.

talents threats to business continuity include not simply ransomware like the WannaCry attack of 2017 but additionally what Sayles called a "wiper attack" reminiscent of NotPetya, additionally from 2017, that seeks to break records without a probable economic gain.

"As cybercriminals develop into smarter, we should also make certain that we continue to live forward of [them] and tackle new threats in the business," Sayles noted.

on the identical time that cyberthreats are evolving and extending, consumer tolerance for any downtime is dropping dramatically. IDC these days posted a report -- subsidized by means of IBM -- about expertise that can support a cyber-resilience strategy. among the many standout records, IDC research experiences that the usual cost of downtime exceeds $200,000 per hour. additionally, the file spoke of that cybersecurity is the leading problem in modern day enterprise local weather.

"[The report] also talked concerning the complexity with digital and the complexity of cloud," Sayles said. "no longer to assert that cloud is not relaxed, but it surely's actually the brand new [question] of 'How will we communicate and make sure breaches are capable of be dealt with even during this new wave of digital transformation and cloud?'"

IBM in August launched Cyber Incident recovery as part of the 7.3 unlock of its Resiliency Orchestration platform. The product, armed with immutable storage support and air-gapped protection, goals to right away improve functions and records within the adventure of a cyberattack.

hearken to the podcast and skim the transcript under to be taught more about IBM's work within the box, cyber-resilience approach and enterprise continuity top of the line practices, standouts from the IDC record and some of the largest threats accessible nowadays.

Editor's be aware: right here transcript has been edited for readability and condensed.

there are so many cyberthreats obtainable presently. What are some ways agencies can improved improve from and cut the have an effect on of those threats and exact cyberattacks?

Andrea Sayles: these days, international cyberattacks are occurring at a a great deal higher expense than they've during the past. I consider all and sundry is seeing the huge media coverage, bringing cyber resiliency and cyberattacks to a new stage of focus within the enterprise community, both IT authorities and the commonplace public. if you choose up a paper or go online, you're going to see, unluckily, all too regularly a public company that has been hit via a cyberattack.

So there may be definitely heightened attention from a cyberattack standpoint and now organizations have to work out how to deal with that. From a disaster restoration and enterprise continuity standpoint, we're used to the earthquakes and floods and typhoons and hurricanes, however here's a whole new enterprise that, from an organizational standpoint, everyone at the C-degree is interested in and has to be anxious with.

or not it's now not just the CIO anymore. It really goes from your board to your CEO to your chief chance officer, chief protection officer, chief operational officer. everybody has to be aligned around a standard set of pursuits and the way to be certain compliance to be certain that there's now not only a unified strategy to healing, but also a unified strategy to communique.

Do you believe companies are thoroughly aware at this factor that it would be an method taken all the way through the corporation, as you observed, together with management and all kinds of tiers of the organization? Do agencies understand that they really need to tackle a cyber-resilience approach comprehensively?

Sayles: it be properly of mind for each C-suite executive that I consult with. it's a extremely entertaining topic. They need to understand what functions and offerings are out in the market nowadays. however now not many are willing to talk publicly about it. lamentably, the ones who are talking publicly are the ones who were hit.

however I definitely agree with it be correct of mind for every person and it be not whatever that's just within the chief guidance safety officer's office anymore. on the conclusion of the day, corporations are spending a lot more time now on how they reply and get well from a cyber incident or cyberattack than they did before.

There is rarely a C-suite government who I've talked to in the past six months who hasn't been very anxious to seek advice from me and to seek advice from the individuals that work for me, to study what's accessible in the marketplace and how they could hold their enterprise secure.

Is it exceptionally ransomware or are there many other cyberthreats that executives are concerned about at this time?

Sayles: or not it's no longer always ransomware as a result of within the case of NotPetya, which came about closing 12 months, that malware in reality was, really, more characteristic of what we'd call a wiper assault. It turned into meant to spoil facts in place of give a monetary benefit like the average ransomware attack. in that case, there became no mechanism to free up the disabled machines notwithstanding a charge had been made.

cutting-edge attacks are not necessarily always for economic gain, however once in a while it's notoriety and sometimes just to trigger disruption within the business. or not it's moved to something this is lots more harmful and hence an awful lot harder to plot for and to remediate towards.

So how are businesses generally getting ready for attacks like that? What are some cyber-resilience method most advantageous practices that they are employing?

Sayles: The swap is that companies aren't considering about the 'if,' they may be thinking about the 'when.' studies have talked about that within the next two years, there is a one in 4 chance that a company may be attacked.

traditionally what we analyze is the countrywide Institute of requisites and technology framework that talks about 'identify, give protection to, detect,' then 'respond and get well.' So it be a 5-tiered sort of a lifecycle.

historically, corporations have spent their time, funds and focal point on the 'establish, give protection to and realize' from a cybersecurity standpoint, or cybersecurity specializing in security pursuits for confidentiality, integrity and availability. but the shift is relocating around the framework to the 'respond and get better,' and that really specializes in the potential of an organization to get back into an working mode as instantly as feasible.

Cyber Incident recuperation is a skill that IBM these days launched in its Resiliency Orchestration offering. can you describe some greater particulars about what's new with that capability?

Sayles: it's a lately introduced skill in Resiliency Orchestration 7.three. it be utility it really is available in a perpetual license or subscription, and it be also attainable as a carrier. it's the advent of automated workflows that run on our catastrophe-healing-as-a-carrier orchestration platform. It permits a company to get well from a cyberattack that's penetrated all statistics copies, including operational backup.

repeatedly a firm is working a continual backup, however in the adventure of a cyberattack, that assault and that malware is in there and destroys the information or corrupts the statistics in these backups. the new Cyber Incident recuperation ability offers short restoration to reduce downtime and meet recuperation objectives.

there is point-in-time records restoration to cut back storage prices. there is immutable storage to meet regulatory compliance. many of our companies and consumers and corporations have very strict regulatory controls. there's the "golden reproduction" in a virtual air gap to check and cut back the possibility of the facts corruption throughout your usual construction networks. eventually, there's records verification to make certain that that backed-up facts continues to be conceivable following an assault. And it be possible because the golden copy is put into that immutable storage inside the digital air-gapped storage.

Do you see the platform evolving over the subsequent 12 months or so? Are there any areas where you feel the product may also be greater or more suitable?

Sayles: We already have a roadmap to make further aspects, functions and capabilities attainable. we are going to be trying to come out with a brand new release with further capabilities. And we will be saying whatever in doubtless the primary quarter of next 12 months. you'll see additional capabilities for both the air gap and the immutable storage.

As cybercriminals turn into smarter, we need to additionally be certain that we continue to stay ahead of them and tackle new threats within the industry as they arrive out.

We're also in the core of typhoon season. What are many ways diverse from a cyber-resilience approach that corporations can prepare for recovery from herbal mess ups?

Sayles: This comprises what i'd call the usual enterprise continuity and healing method. You may say, 'smartly, might be I can't plan for an earthquake.' however a hurricane is tons less complicated to devise for. They nonetheless may also be as impactful to the business as a cyberattack. but groups can plan for it and our purchasers traditionally have hung out and money specializing in the recovery of that endeavor and how they offer protection to the company and the people.

From an IBM standpoint, we have obtained amenities that have built-in both cloud and conventional information centers and conventional healing capabilities. We're monitoring these catastrophe events and mobilizing our supplies, to make sure that we've got obtained infrastructure accessible for valued clientele normally. We're making bound that infrastructure is correctly configured and corporations can tackle the threats.

IBM has lately more suitable partnerships with several information insurance policy carriers, as an example Actifio and Zerto, simply to identify a couple. What do these partnerships bring to the desk for IBM?

Sayles: we will at all times look to bring companions in to raise and supplement our offerings. repeatedly, our companions have capabilities that enable us to get anything to market sooner. And we are able to proceed to verify and evaluate capabilities of these companions that we have lengthy-standing relationships with, such as the ones you had outlined. we are going to continue to work with them. we are going to also continue to consider new partners.

finally, is there the rest that you just desired to point out about cyber-resilience strategy or your company that we did not touch on?

Sayles: Incidents that once would were considered remarkable are becoming more and more regular today. when you consider that, it is integral for businesses to revisit their normal safety classes and increase cyber-resilience capabilities and approaches to work out a way to out-think cybercriminals. The expenses of breaches are in the hundreds of thousands and thousands to billions of dollars.

We should have a a good deal more holistic view throughout the company when it involves how we boost plans and the way we increase what our consumers have today to handle these new threats on earth.

AT&T signed an 'eight-digit' deal that is rarely first rate news for VMware, Cisco, or Huawei — however could be fantastic for Google Cloud | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

AT&T is in the course of an ambitious task called Airship that may have sweeping implications for the $350 billion telecom gadget trade.

Late last week, AT&T signed an "eight-figure," three-12 months take care of a company known as Mirantis. in accordance with Mirantis, the company will assist AT&T build out and manage the infrastructure it wants for its 5G community.

Airship potential that in case you are looking to construct a cloud, really good hardware and software from companies like VMware, Cisco, Juniper, and Huawei are needless, Mirantis' cofounder and chief advertising officer, Boris Renski, tells us.

AT&T's Airship, which is open-supply software, will run in the telecom big's facts facilities, working the utility vital for core 5G features like routing mobile calls or streaming and processing video, Renski says.

And a lot of telco agencies are staring at to peer the way it turns out.

"AT&T is the biggest, baddest, oldest telco obtainable," Renski says. "For this refresh cycle, for the first time in telco historical past, they are making a choice on to not purchase new [proprietary] bins however, in its place, use tech open sourced by means of Google to refresh their community for their 5G cycle. this can set the precedent in the business."

AT&T hopes that precedent extends far past telecommunications, Amy Wheelus, the business's vp of network Cloud & Infrastructure, informed business Insider in an emailed remark.

there's been "loads of hobby in Airship," she said, including that it become "no longer simply from telcos." AT&T expects different industries to make use of Airship for his or her own giant information-core tasks, too, from producers to healthcare organizations.

Airship is championed with the aid of AT&T, however the enterprise would not truly personal or preserve it. it is run by means of the OpenStack groundwork, an industry neighborhood that's the keeper of several open-supply tasks. AT&T is a member of the OpenStack groundwork, as are IBM and Comcast, amongst others.

Airship turned into launched remaining spring, spearheaded with the aid of AT&T, Intel, and SK Telecom. but activity has been so excessive that Wheelus says it be "on track" to "graduate" by means of subsequent spring, meaning it can be upgraded from its in-building reputation and deemed equipped for companies to use with self assurance.

VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger. Yuya Shino/Reuters Airship is stitching collectively a few open-supply software technologies to make it less complicated for companies to construct, run, and scale giant cloud computing projects at the measurement of groups like AT&T.

Mirantis, AT&T, and those concerned with Airship should be making OpenStack, an information-core working device, work with one more massively frequent, open-supply cloud expertise known as Kubernetes.

Kubernetes, every now and then called K8S, is a application-container management equipment. utility containers are a vastly typical know-how for cloud apps that be sure the app works neatly no be counted which cloud it lives on — no matter if or not it's Amazon web features, Microsoft Azure, or any one else's. An increasing variety of programmers use Kubernetes to manipulate all of their containers.

AT&T checked out choices from VMware for this venture and nixed the idea, AT&T's Ryan Van Wyk, a cloud engineer government, advised Mitch Wagner of the telecom news web page light analyzing.

"There really is rarely tons of an choice," Van Wyk advised easy analyzing. "Your alternative is VMware. we now have carried out the assessments, and VMware doesn't examine containers we want."

Containers in universal, and Kubernetes in particular, are generally regarded a substitute for VMware's flagship technology, known as virtualization. In consciousness of the moving tide, VMware in late 2018 purchased a startup called Heptio. Heptio become headquartered with the aid of two of the three folks who created Kubernetes during their time at Google. This capacity VMware additionally offers its own business Kubernetes product.

however because Google has made Kubernetes a free and open-supply utility task, Airship would not deserve to buy a business Kubernetes product or service. It can make Kubernetes work with OpenStack, yet another open-source assignment, without paying utility license costs to any individual. That removes an incredible barrier to entry.

because AT&T is the usage of open-source utility as it upgrades its infrastructure to address 5G, Airship should be able to run on decrease-can charge, commercially available off-the-shelf hardware, typical in business talk as COTS.

Huawei applied sciences CEO Ren Zhengfei.Dmitry LovetskySo the place AT&T might customarily spend big on new hardware to manage this change, it could actually retailer a ton through the use of extra with ease accessible, more cost-effective products. That bodes poorly for the legacy statistics-center hardware providers.

"historically these [upgrade] cycles are a chance for the likes of Huawei, Cisco, Juniper, and many others. to signal huge contracts and sell their huge preintegrated hardware packing containers," Mirantis' Renski says.

And this is rarely the most effective high-profile attempt within the telco trade to movement toward much less costly hardware on free, open-supply software.

SK Telecom has also been concerned in the Telecom Infra venture, at the start spearheaded by means of facebook, which is also growing open-supply telecom utility and hardware. AT&T is never a member of that undertaking, although it's worried in the different fb-spawned hardware company — the Open Compute venture, which is growing open-source hardware for statistics facilities.

And Wheelus tells us that AT&T has embraced open-source projects and has no plans to go returned.

Open supply, which makes it possible for all the application's users to build what they need and want collectively, helps AT&T "move away from the proprietary solutions that existed previously from specific providers," she stated. "This enables us to hold costs low and flow quickly adopting innovative capabilities very rapidly. ordinary AT&T has committed over 10 million traces of code to open source communities — and no signals of slowing down."

So, if the natural companies are being placed on word via upstart open-supply telecom tasks like Airship and Telecom Infra task, who is rubbing their fingers in glee?

The reply: Google, at least when it involves Airship.

"The greatest winner is Google because they are the fathers of Kubernetes," Renski says.

Amy Wheelus, AT&T's vice chairman of community Cloud & Infrastructure.YouTube/TelecomTVGoogle first developed Kubernetes to be used internally on its large statistics centers and apps. Google has due to the fact released it as open supply, making it freely accessible to anybody. it be on account that become so customary that the entire foremost clouds had been forced to aid it.

but because it turned into created via Google, Google's cloud remains regarded the finest for Kubernetes-based apps. in fact, Google engineers are nonetheless those who make contributions essentially the most code to Kubernetes, in line with tracking site Stackalytics.

To be certain, Google and its cloud aren't directly worried in AT&T's 5G assignment. AT&T's use of Airship will run in AT&T's data centers and not on any cloud.

however as startups and current carriers race to create 5G apps for telecom providers and clients alike, they are more likely to host them in the cloud. and since Kubernetes remains a keystone accomplishment for Google, they can be extra likely to turn to Google Cloud, over competitors like Amazon web capabilities and Microsoft Azure.

The telcos are additionally the huge winners, who accept as true with they will be constructing the tech they should make 5G a fact, whereas decreasing costs.

"It has the capabilities to tremendously change the way we feel about deploying and managing software sooner or later," AT&T's Wheelus mentioned.

Actifio Launches Actifio GO SaaS Platform | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Unquestionably it is hard assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. We never trade off on our review, reputation and quality on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Uniquely we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something like this, simply remember there are constantly awful individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our specimen questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-2]

1Z0-525 examcollection | ST0-050 braindumps | 1Y0-308 Practice Test | JN0-310 VCE | C9060-509 free pdf | 156-215-77 test prep | HP2-H12 questions answers | HP0-A16 practice exam | E20-559 real questions | 70-543-VB mock exam | HP2-Z27 dumps questions | 642-427 practice test | LCAC exam questions | HP2-N41 free pdf | ICDL-WINDOWS study guide | 300-115 free pdf | 000-087 dumps | RH-202 practice questions | HP2-B62 brain dumps | JN0-346 sample test |

Precisely same 000-068 questions as in real test, WTF!
We have Tested and Approved 000-068 Exams. killexams.com gives the most specific and most recent IT exam materials which nearly comprise all exam topics. With the database of our 000-068 exam materials, you do not have to squander your opportunity on perusing time consuming reference books and surely need to burn thru 10-20 hours to ace our 000-068 real questions and answers.

We have our experts working continuously for the collection of real exam questions of 000-068. All the pass4sure questions and answers of 000-068 gathered by using our crew are reviewed and up to date through our IBM certified team. We stay connected to the applicants regarded in the 000-068 exam to get their evaluations approximately the 000-068 exam, we collect 000-068 exam tips and hints, their enjoy approximately the techniques used within the real 000-068 exam, the errors they accomplished inside the actual exam after which enhance our material accordingly. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-068 Once you undergo our pass4sure questions and answers, you will feel assured about all the subjects of exam and experience that your know-how has been greatly stepped forward. These pass4sure questions and answers are not simply exercise questions, these are real exam questions and answers which will be sufficient to pass the 000-068 exam at first attempt. killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

At killexams.com, we provide thoroughly reviewed IBM 000-068 schooling resources which can be the best for Passing 000-068 test, and to get licensed via IBM. It is a great preference to accelerate your career as a professional in the Information Technology enterprise. We are happy with our reputation of supporting people pass the 000-068 exam of their very first attempts. Our success prices in the past years had been actually dazzling, thanks to our glad clients who are now able to boost their career within the speedy lane. killexams.com is the primary choice among IT professionals, specifically those who are seeking to climb up the hierarchy ranges faster in their respective corporations. IBM is the enterprise leader in records generation, and getting certified by them is a guaranteed way to prevail with IT careers. We help you do exactly that with our excessive pleasant IBM 000-068 schooling materials.

IBM 000-068 is omnipresent all around the world, and the commercial enterprise and software solutions provided by using them are being embraced by way of nearly all of the organizations. They have helped in driving lots of agencies on the sure-shot route of pass. Comprehensive information of IBM products are taken into prepation a completely crucial qualification, and the experts certified by way of them are quite valued in all organizations.

We offer real 000-068 pdf exam questions and answers braindumps in formats. Download PDF & Practice Tests. Pass IBM 000-068 e-book Exam quickly & easily. The 000-068 braindumps PDF type is to be had for reading and printing. You can print greater and exercise normally. Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the similarity percent between our 000-068 syllabus study manual and actual exam is 90% based totally on our seven-yr educating experience. Do you want achievements inside the 000-068 exam in just one try? I am currently analyzing for the IBM 000-068 real exam.

Cause all that matters here is passing the 000-068 - Infrastructure Virtualization/Business(R) Resilience Tech Design exam. As all which you need is a high score of IBM 000-068 exam. The most effective one aspect you need to do is downloading braindumps of 000-068 exam exam courses now. We will no longer will let you down with our money-back assure. The experts additionally preserve tempo with the maximum up to date exam so that you can present with the most people of updated materials. Three months loose get entry to as a way to them thru the date of buy. Every candidates may also afford the 000-068 exam dumps thru killexams.com at a low price. Often there may be a reduction for all people all.

In the presence of the authentic exam content of the brain dumps at killexams.com you may easily expand your niche. For the IT professionals, it's far crucial to modify their skills consistent with their profession requirement. We make it smooth for our customers to take certification exam with the help of killexams.com proven and genuine exam material. For a brilliant future in the world of IT, our brain dumps are the high-quality choice.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


A top dumps writing is a totally vital feature that makes it easy a good way to take IBM certifications. But 000-068 braindumps PDF gives convenience for candidates. The IT certification is quite a difficult assignment if one does now not locate right guidance within the form of genuine useful resource material. Thus, we've true and up to date content material for the education of certification exam.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-4]

Killexams PCAT study guide | Killexams EX0-001 bootcamp | Killexams 7303-1 brain dumps | Killexams 920-552 questions and answers | Killexams M2110-233 pdf download | Killexams 000-533 test prep | Killexams 922-103 practice questions | Killexams CAT-220 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-966 free pdf download | Killexams 000-239 questions answers | Killexams 70-764 exam prep | Killexams A2010-597 real questions | Killexams BAS-001 practice questions | Killexams EX0-110 dumps | Killexams 74-409 VCE | Killexams 000-201 practice exam | Killexams C2180-184 questions and answers | Killexams C2070-580 test questions | Killexams GE0-703 sample test | Killexams 0G0-081 cram |

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-5]

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps

Killexams HP5-H03D bootcamp | Killexams H11-851 braindumps | Killexams MB2-717 free pdf | Killexams 000-883 study guide | Killexams HP2-H14 practice exam | Killexams 351-001 Practice Test | Killexams EW0-100 questions answers | Killexams HP2-Z25 VCE | Killexams VCP510-DT test prep | Killexams 9A0-039 mock exam | Killexams CPSM exam questions | Killexams HP0-380 cram | Killexams OMG-OCUP-300 free pdf | Killexams AVA questions and answers | Killexams 840-425 sample test | Killexams HP2-H17 real questions | Killexams 000-724 braindumps | Killexams JN0-102 braindumps | Killexams N10-007 exam prep | Killexams 1Z0-574 test prep |

Infrastructure Virtualization/Business(R) Resilience Tech Design

HPE Partners With Samsung on 5G, Launches Telco Edge System | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) today launched an edge system for telecommunications networks and announced a new 5G partnership with Samsung. The two companies will provide a joint edge-to-core virtual radio access network (vRAN) product based on Samsung’s radio network technologies and system integration services, and HPE’s new Edgeline EL8000 Converged Edge System.

The new Edgeline EL8000 Converged Edge System targets communication service providers, and follows four earlier edge products that HPE rolled out in November. That roll out was part of CEO Antonio Neri’s pledge to invest $4 billion in edge technologies and services over the next four years.

“We’re launching a new platform to remove a bottle neck for data-intensive, low-latency workloads for the telco edge in particular,” said Gerald Kleyn, senior director of product management, systems R&D and operations, for HPE’s Converged Servers, Edge, and IoT Systems business.

The open standards-based system is designed to replace current proprietary edge systems. It targets use cases including media streaming, IoT, artificial intelligence (AI), and video analytics.

The edge platform has a single-socket design and uses Intel Xeon Scalable Processors. System components can be combined, scaled, and hot-swapped to meet demands. They support, among others, Nvidia Tesla graphics processing units (GPUs); field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) from Intel and Xilinx; network interface cards (NICs) from Intel or Mellanox; and up to 1.5 terabytes (TB) of memory and 16 TB of storage.

HPE built security into the systems: “our silicon root of trust, the ability to rollback a firmware version if you detect a breach in your network — some pretty important security factors that become even more important when you are out at the far-flung edge,” Kleyn said.

The system comes in a compact and ruggedized form factor. “We shrunk it down to 17-inches deep, which means it can go into smaller footprint locations,” Kleyn said.

And the systems include HPE iLO 5 technology and the newly developed Chassis Manager software. That software enables remote provisioning, ongoing system health monitoring, updates, and management across thousands of cell sites without needing IT expertise on site.

HPE’s partnership with Samsung supports 5G rollouts. The joint vRAN product will combine Samsung’s radio network technologies and HPE’s new Edgeline system.

This builds on HPE’s existing original equipment manufacturer (OEM) partnership with Samsung, said Phil Cutrone, vice president and general manager of HPE’s Worldwide OEM, Hybrid Cloud, Data Center Infrastructure Group. “They will work with us closely to tightly couple their RAN software as well as a virtual RAN and cloud RAN solution,” he said.

These systems will also use Tech Mahindra’s multi-access edge computing (MEC) software, which will allow service providers to use existing 4G LTE infrastructure to deploy some applications requiring the low-latency, high-bandwidth of 5G networks.

Kleyn explained that “not all 5G networks are going to roll out immediately. But by focusing on MEC they can run some of these same applications that 5G promises on 4G networks.”

Urban, Social Data Helps Reduce Fire and Safety Risk | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

MetroLab Network has partnered with Government Technology to bring its readers a segment called the MetroLab Innovation of the Month Series, which highlights impactful tech, data, and innovation projects underway between cities and universities. If you’d like to learn more or contact the project leads, please contact MetroLab at info@metrolabnetwork.org for more information.

In this month’s installment of the Innovation of the Month series, we explore Portland Fire and Rescue’s Blueprint for Success, a new initiative aimed at creating preventative emergency planning in Portland, Ore.  

MetroLab’s Executive Director Ben Levine spoke with Robyn Burek, principal management analyst for Portland Fire and Rescue; Megan Horst, assistant professor, Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning at Portland State University; Eric Pedersen, captain of Fire Station 22; and Mike Myers, former fire chief for the city of Portland, to learn more. 

Ben Levine: Could you please describe what the Blueprint for Success project is? Who is involved in this effort?  

Robyn Burek: The Blueprint for Success is a project that tasks Portland Fire and Rescue (PF&R) firefighters across all ranks to consider the root causes that are contributing to an increase in emergency call volume, specific to their Fire Management Area (FMA). 

Based on the data, we know that social indicators such as poverty, lower education, mental health, isolation and marginalization contribute to increased risk for fire and emergency medical response. We also know that we live in the 26th largest U.S. city, with a population of approximately 650,000, and therefore the demographics and types of emergency responses will vary widely across a city of our size. Hence, it is important that each station get to know the unique strengths and needs of the specific communities that they serve.

Chief Mike Myers: Blueprint for Success originated from the bureau-wide goal for zero fire deaths and how we might achieve that. It was clear that a citywide approach was necessary, but a single front was not the solution. We would need to build plans for each neighborhood individually, specific to the needs and threats in that neighborhood. We also found that the leaders of the fire stations were under-utilized. Their primary focus was emergency response, and the prevention effort was the sole responsibility of the prevention division. The prevention division is not focused in neighborhoods directly, they are focused on building and occupancy types. The final reason for the Blueprint for Success was the idea that we might be able to predict fire based on livability or vibrancy scoring. This is new to our industry. The more vibrant an area the less likely violent injury or fatalities will happen. 

Today, fire captains are asked to manage their response areas as if they were the fire chief of the area; meet the people, learn about the community and link fire predictability data with hazard reduction plans.

Burek: With this project, we’ve partnered with Portland State University’s School of Urban Studies and Planning to help us do three specific things: assemble data specific to each station’s FMA; assist us with surveying the community inside each FMA; and help us strategize ways to improve public health, mental health, racial equity, community safety, and access to housing and other resources for each FMA. By addressing these areas of need, we hope to see long-term reductions in our call volume, and the cultivation of a healthier and more vibrant city. 

Our partnership with PSU is also just the beginning. We are also seeking collaborative opportunities with other city bureaus including the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS), the Office of Community and Civic Life, Portland Bureau of Emergency Management, Portland Bureau of Transportation and the Joint Office of Homeless Services. In addition to our city partners, we encourage each station to identify community organizations and nonprofits that work within their FMA with whom we can also partner. Ultimately, this project is too big for the Fire Bureau to tackle on its own. We are not social workers or counselors, nor are we city planners. But we do hold a piece of the puzzle and we believe that with the right partners we can build a more vibrant city. 

Former Chief Myers and Robyn Burek of PF&R, speaking to an audience about the Blueprint for Success and hosting the first Idea Launch event in November 2018. Courtesy of Robyn Burek. 

Levine: Can you describe some of the pressures that motivated you to address this particular challenge? 

Burek: PF&R started the Blueprint for Success project on the idea that vibrant cities don’t burn, and healthy, happy communities are less reliant on emergency services. As PF&R’s call volume continues to increase (about 28 percent in the past six years), we recognize that this is in part due to population growth (about 17 percent in the past 10 years), but we also acknowledge that social indicators are a key factor for the rise in call volume. Therefore, we have a choice as a fire bureau: We can either continue to be reactive and simply respond to the rising call volume, or we can assess the root causes and underlying systems at play to try to build a more vibrant, healthy community.

Captain Eric Pedersen: The demands on the fire service are changing rapidly and our historic response models and business practices are often struggling to adapt. The needs of each fire station’s local community can differ greatly, so the Blueprint for Success is designed to identify specific needs and generate new ideas for addressing them from the lowest level. Allowing station personnel the autonomy and authority to innovate within their specific communities will be a more effective and efficient way of adapting to our changing roles. 

Megan Horst: I really appreciate the focus on root causes and underlying systems in this planning process. Often a lot of city action is reactive, or departments end up doing things just because they have done them that way before. The Blueprint for Success Project is a different initiative that asks us to understand why some people are more vulnerable than others, and to identify upstream interventions that reduce these vulnerabilities and enhance people’s safety and resilience. It is really thinking outside the box.

Captain Eric Pedersen of Station 22 and Battalion Chief Steve Bregman are chatting with a presenter, a woman from the local neighborhood association who presented an idea to safely remove needles off the streets. They were able to supply her with some caps and also share information about PF&R's new needles drop box that was installed at Station 22 — a solution that came out of the Blueprint for Success project. Courtesy of Robyn Burek. 

Levine: What kind of data are you exploring and why? What have been some of your initial findings in your research, and is this changing how you view the issue? 

Burek: We asked PSU to help us collect data on six different categories for each FMA: urban form, demographics, livability, social vulnerability, homelessness and medical/fire calls. 

Urban form tells the story of residential density, commercial density, and how industrialized or wooded an area is. These factors indicate a different level and type of risk, as well as where fire and EMS crews are likely to get dispatched to the most.  

Second, PSU collects census data on the demographics of each neighborhood. A single FMA can include two or more neighborhoods and the demographics often vary widely depending on the neighborhood.

Next, PF&R looks at livability. For the time being, PF&R and PSU have agreed to define livability to include access to food, transportation options and bike/walk scores. But we also realize that this is a limited definition of livability, and PF&R and PSU have been discussing how to enrich this category with better data.

Fourth, PSU looks up the social vulnerability index (SVI) for each neighborhood through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website. The SVI is an indicator of both vulnerability and resiliency within a community. Most surprising is to see how nearby neighborhoods can differ greatly in terms of their SVI. 

Last, we have PSU provide us a summary of our call data. One category is homelessness: How many homeless-related calls were responded to in each FMA? The other two categories are medical- and fire-related calls. PSU provides PF&R with a list of the top five codes for medical and fire responses in each FMA. What’s interesting about this is that one FMA might respond to more “trouble breathing”-related calls than another FMA, and we’ve been able to tie that back to urban form. For instance, FMA 22 is highly industrialized, which means that there are more particles floating in the air, and this is likely contributing to an increase in breathing issues for its residents.

Ultimately, these six categories help to set a foundation, but it is an incomplete story without surveying the community and conducting community outreach. Community outreach is our last step in collecting data.

Horst: Robyn described a lot of the data collection very well. I will just add that PSU students will be implementing surveys of community members this winter to find out what they know about Portland Fire and Rescue and to get their input on the Blueprint for Success. This will be an exciting and challenging part of the project.

Infographic explaining the Idea Launch process to inform the Blueprint for Success. Courtesy of Robyn Burek.

Levine: Are you aware how findings developed in this project are/will impact city planning and/or development in this topic? If yes, how and where?

Burek: PF&R believes that urban planning is a major key to building vibrant cities. We’ve initiated talks with BPS and there is interest from both sides to collaborate. For example, one initiative is to compare our data on social vulnerability populations across neighborhoods to ensure we’re both capturing the needs and the issues as best and consistently as we can. Fire responses tend to overlap with areas that are socially vulnerable, and it could provide a different and useful lens to BPS. But even more interesting is a discussion about our two bureaus creating a predictive model for gentrification. One of the risks we face as we work to create a vibrant community is consequentially pushing out the residents of that community. Along with that, we’re discussing ways of how to mitigate and prevent gentrification from occurring. For instance, perhaps we partner with other organizations to not only provide local jobs, but to also provide workforce and skills training so local residents can get good-paying jobs located in their neighborhoods and can earn higher wages, allowing them to stay in an inflated housing market. Those are just some of the conversations we’re having with BPS and the direction that we’re going in relation to the Blueprint for Success and this concept of vibrant cities.

To date our collaborative efforts have mostly entailed support from PF&R to create narrower streets in order to promote safer streets for pedestrians. Most fire departments have not historically been behind an initiative like this because it makes it more difficult for emergency vehicles to respond to a scene. But we have also committed to a vision zero initiative that includes zero traffic deaths, and in order for us to achieve that goal we must support safer streets and prioritize prevention. At this time, we’ve identified a potential area of the city to use as a pilot. BPS is currently developing some plans for that area and has invited PF&R to the table. 

Horst: The project is still young, and I am excited to think about the possible impacts to city planning and development. Fire and rescue and planning are fields with plenty of overlap. In fact, planning for fire prevention has had a great influence on urban planning, from building code to street design. We are now entering a new era of this interplay, which might include challenging some old paradigms and developing new ways of thinking and doing that make our cities more livable and residents as safe as possible in today’s context.

Robyn’s mention of PF&R’s support for creating narrower streets, or “road diets,” is a perfect example of adaptation by both fields to make cities safer for children, the elderly, people with vision and mobility impairments, and people who are walking and biking. There is plenty of opportunity to do more “road diets” in a lot of places in Portland to help make it safer for people to get around, and ultimately lead to fewer automobile crashes, pedestrian deaths, etc.; plus it would increase neighborhood walkability and cut down on air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, part of long-term city livability. But it will require that Fire and Rescue adapt to skinnier roads and turning radii — and I think it is awesome they are willing to do that.

Another obvious area of overlap is when you bring a social equity or social vulnerability lens to the work, it becomes very clear that renters, folks with lower incomes, with less education, communities who have experienced historical oppression, etc., are also more vulnerable to fire risk. So what can both Fire and Rescue and BPS do about that?

Levine: What was the most surprising thing you learned during this process? 

Captain Pedersen: By necessity, the fire service has a “top down,” military-style organizational structure. It works very well for emergency response but can stifle innovation and engagement from lower levels within the organization. As this project developed, I was surprised at how quickly our lowest-level employees started generating ideas and independently seeking opportunities to address community needs. 

Horst: One cool thing we have learned is that there is a lot of synergy among good urban planning and planning for the future of Fire and Rescue. By that I mean both ask questions like: What is our vision of a safe, livable city? What strategies get us there?

I also have been humbled by the willingness of Portland Fire and Rescue leaders and staff — from the chief and administrator to captains and firefighters themselves — to deeply examine their role as public servants in these dynamic times. That takes courage.

Burek: The most surprising thing that I’ve witnessed during this process has been the responses from the other city bureaus. Most bureaus have priorities and projects that they work on separate from the rest of the organization, and while there certainly is some collaboration that takes place between bureaus, ultimately the mission of each bureau is different. What I’ve found encouraging is to watch other bureau directors pitch the Blueprint for Success in director meetings. It’s no longer just a PF&R initiative. It’s gradually becoming a citywide initiative. And along with that there’s a shift in thinking that I see taking place where bureaus are beginning to consider the larger picture that ties us all together. There comes a challenge with that, though, to rethink how we work together and how we shift our money to focus more on prevention and quality-of-life initiatives like parks. We’re not quite there yet, but the conversation has been started.

Infographic explaining the Blueprint for Success. Courtesy of Robyn Burek.

Levine: Where will this project go from here?

Burek: Our fire chief and the founder of the Blueprint for Success, Mike Myers, has announced his retirement. My hope is that this project is far enough along that the next chief will see the value and continue to endorse it. At this time, we’re set to engage the next four FMAs this fall and bring PSU back to assist us. In addition to working with PSU, we’re also holding our second Idea Launch event in spring 2019. Idea Launch is an open mic night that’s held in the bay of a fire station where firefighters, city bureaus and community members are invited to pitch their ideas. Speakers are allotted five minutes to share their ideas on how to improve community safety and address mental health, public health, racial equity, or affordable housing and access to resources, and then the audience members can roundtable with the speakers to discuss how to get the ideas off the ground. 

Horst: One thing that is great about this partnership is that it is a long-term relationship; the plan is for PSU to work with PF&R on the Blueprint for at least several years. In future years, our masters of urban planning students will likely implement a similar research process to the one described above with different FMAs, building on what we learned in this round. To me, long-term, mutually beneficial relationships are the best kind of city-university partnerships. 

Burek: In addition to the four new FMAs that will engage with PSU this fall, and the second Idea Launch that is scheduled in the spring, we will continue to work on our pilot with BPS and collaborate with the other bureaus. Over time, the Blueprint for Success project may be tweaked and improved upon, but ultimately my goal is to ensure that the philosophy behind it remains steadfast. And in the words of Chief Myers, that philosophy is that vibrant cities don’t burn.

About MetroLab: MetroLab Network introduces a new model for bringing data, analytics and innovation to local government: a network of institutionalized, cross-disciplinary partnerships between cities/counties and their universities. Its membership includes more than 40 such partnerships in the United States, ranging from mid-size cities to global metropolises. These city-university partnerships focus on research, development and deployment of projects that offer technologically and analytically based solutions to challenges facing urban areas including: inequality in income, health, mobility, security and opportunity; aging infrastructure; and environmental sustainability and resiliency. MetroLab was launched as part of the White House’s 2015 Smart Cities Initiative. Learn more at metrolabnetwork.org or on Twitter @metrolabnetwork.

National Academy of Engineering elects 86 members and 18 foreign members | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

WASHINGTON -- The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has elected 86 new members and 18 foreign members, announced NAE President C. D. (Dan) Mote, Jr., today. This brings the total U.S. membership to 2,297 and the number of foreign members to 272.

Election to the National Academy of Engineering is among the highest professional distinctions accorded to an engineer. Academy membership honors those who have made outstanding contributions to "engineering research, practice, or education, including, where appropriate, significant contributions to the engineering literature" and to "the pioneering of new and developing fields of technology, making major advancements in traditional fields of engineering, or developing/implementing innovative approaches to engineering education."

Individuals in the newly elected class will be formally inducted during a ceremony at the NAE's annual meeting in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 6, 2019. A list of the newly elected members and foreign members follows, with their primary affiliations at the time of election and a brief statement of their principal engineering accomplishments.

New Members

Agonafer, Dereje, Jenkins Garrett Professor and director, mechanical and aerospace engineering department, University of Texas, Arlington. For contributions to computer-aided electro/thermo/mechanical design and modeling of electronic equipment.

Ahuja, Krishan K., Regents Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta. For the development of quieter aerosystems and contributions to aeroacoustics research, literature, and education.

Aizenberg, Joanna, Amy Smith Berylson Professor of Materials Science and professor of chemistry and chemical biology, School of Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. For contributions to understanding of biological systems and bioinspired materials design.

Antonsson, Erik K., president and chief executive officer, aiPod Inc., Pasadena, Calif. For leadership in the development of aerospace/defense systems, formal methods of engineering design, and active learning in engineering education.

Axelrad, Penina, Joseph T. Negler Professor, Ann and H.J. Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder. For application of multipath GPS signals to improve satellite navigation and new approaches to remote sensing.

Baker, Mary, chairman and president, ATA Engineering Inc., San Diego. For computer simulation methods for structural mechanics problems and engineering leadership.

Balta, Wayne S., vice president, corporate environmental affairs and product safety, IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y. For advancing corporate environmental sustainability practices worldwide.

Barabino, Gilda A., Daniel and Frances Berg Professor and dean, Grove School of Engineering, City College of New York, New York City. For leadership in bioengineering research and inclusive models of bioengineering education and faculty mentoring.

Barrangou, Rodolphe, Todd R. Klaenhammer Distinguished Scholar in Probiotics Research, and professor, food, bioprocessing, and nutrition science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh. For discovery of CRISPR-Cas genome editing and engineering microbes, plants, and animals for food and other applications.

Barros, Ana P., James L. Meriam Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, N.C. For contributions to understanding and prediction of precipitation dynamics and flood hazards in mountainous terrains.

Benioff, Marc R., chairman and co-chief executive officer, Salesforce, San Francisco. For leadership in cloud computing and corporate philanthropy.

Bishop, David J., director, CELL-MET Engineering Research Center, and head, division of materials science and engineering, Boston University, Boston. For contributions and leadership in high-capacity optical switch technology.

Biswas, Pratim, Stanley and Lucy Lopata Professor and chair, department of energy, environmental, and chemical engineering, Washington University, St. Louis. For advancing the science of aerosol dynamics and particle removal technologies.

Braatz, Richard D., Edwin R. Gilliland Professor of Chemical Engineering, chemical engineering department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. For contributions to diagnosis and control of large-scale and molecular processes for materials, microelectronics, and pharmaceuticals manufacturing.

Broadbelt, Linda J., Sarah Rebecca Roland Professor, department of chemical and biological engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill. For contributions to complex kinetic modeling, particularly for understanding the pathways by which hydrocarbons and polymers undergo pyrolysis.

Chen, Wei, Wilson-Cook Professor in Engineering Design and professor of mechanical engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill. For contributions to design under uncertainty in products and systems, and leadership in the engineering design community.

Clark, Douglas S., dean, College of Chemistry, and professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering, University of California, Berkeley. For advances in biocatalyst and bioreaction engineering for drug discovery, drug screening, and bioprocessing.

Conger IV, Harry M. "Red," president and chief operating officer, Americas, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Phoenix. For contributions to copper mine/plant design and leadership of Freeport to become the world's top private copper producer.

Deisseroth, Karl, D.H. Chen Professor, bioengineering and psychiatry and behavioral sciences, Stanford University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, Calif. For molecular and optical tools for discovery and control of neuronal signals behind animal behavior in health and disease.

Deligianni, Hariklia, retired research scientist, IBM Corp., Tenafly, N.J. For electrochemical processes used by major microelectronic chip producers worldwide.

Eccles, Thomas J., rear admiral, U.S. Navy (retired), and chief executive officer, Trident Maritime Systems, Arlington, Va. For service in naval engineering and advances in submarine technology.

England, Paul, director, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash. For defining the hardware foundations of secure computing, Trusted Platform Module, and secure enclaves, and for conceiving the darknet.

Erdemir, Ali, Distinguished Fellow and program lead, materials for harsh conditions, applied materials division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne Ill. For contributions to the science and technology of friction, lubrication, and wear.

Fascetti, Robert J., retired vice president, global powertrain engineering, Ford Motor Co., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. For leadership in powertrain products with improved fuel economy, superior performance, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Gallimore, Alec D., Robert J. Vlasic Dean of Engineering and professor, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. For advanced spacecraft electric propulsion, especially Hall thruster technology.

Glotzer, Sharon C., Anthony C. Lembke Department Chair of Chemical Engineering and professor, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. For development of computer-based design principles for assembly engineering and manufacturing of advanced materials and nanotechnology.

Grejner-Brzezinska, Dorota A., Lowber B. Strange Endowed Professor and chair, civil, environmental, and geodetic engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus. For contributions to geodetic science and satellite navigation, including integration with artificial intelligence.

Halpern, Joseph Y., Joseph C. Ford Professor of Engineering, computer science department, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. For methods of reasoning about knowledge, belief, and uncertainty and their applications to distributed computing and multiagent systems.

Hassan, Yassin A., Sallie and Don Davis '61 Professor in Engineering, departments of nuclear engineering and mechanical engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station. For experimentally validated thermal hydraulic analyses of multiphase flow fields for nuclear reactor operations.

Heritage, Jonathan P., professor emeritus, department of electrical and computer engineering, University of California, Davis. For contributions to optical pulse shaping and wavelength selective optical switches.

Hudson, Linda P., chairman and chief executive officer, The Cardea Group, Charlotte, N.C. For leadership in development and production of military systems, and for mentoring and developing future engineering leaders.

Ingebritsen, Steven E., research hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Interior, Menlo Park, Calif. For contributions to understanding the role of groundwater in geologic processes.

Jordan, William C., principal, Jordan Analytics LLC, Beverly Hills, Mich. For development of analytic methods to improve manufacturing systems and for quantitative analysis of future mobility systems.

Katz, Joseph, William F. Ward Sr. Distinguished Professor, department of mechanical engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. For development of optical methods in experimental fluid mechanics for turbomachinery, cavitation, turbulence, and environmental flows.

Khoshnevis, Behrokh, president and chief executive officer, Contour Crafting Corp., El Segundo, Calif. For innovations in manufacturing and construction, including the application of 3D printing methods.

Kiesler, Sara, program director, division of social and economic sciences, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, Va. For leadership, technical innovation, and identification of social trends with the adoption of computers and robots in work and society.

Kircher, Charles A., principal, Kircher & Associates, Palo Alto, Calif. For advancing structural engineering practice in earthquake engineering and loss prevention in building design.

Kiss, Robert, vice president, process and analytical development, Sutro Biopharma Inc., South San Francisco. For contributions to mammalian cell culture and microbial processes that produce recombinant proteins and antibodies.

Kogel, Jessica E., associate director for mining, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta. For sustainable development and innovation of industrial clay products and processes.

Koon, John H., president, John H. Koon & Associates, Atlanta. For contributions to the design of systems to treat chemically complex industrial wastewaters.

Kuehmann, Charles J., vice president of materials engineering, SpaceX and Tesla Motors, Palo Alto, Calif. For contributions to the creation and commercialization of computational materials design.

Kumar, Anil, associate fellow, specialty coatings and materials, PPG, Monroeville, Pa. For contributions in photochromism and variable polarization and leadership in commercialization.

Lam, Monica S., professor, computer science department, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. For contributions to the design of advanced compiler and analysis systems for high-performance computers.

Lievense, Jefferson C., senior adviser to the chief executive officer, bioengineering and technology, Genomatica Inc., San Diego. For leadership in biomanufacturing of sustainable chemicals.

*Lorenz, Robert D., Elmer and Janet Kaiser Chair and Consolidated Papers Professor of Controls Engineering, department of mechanical engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison. For contributions to modeling and control of cross-coupled electromechanical systems for high-performance electric machines and drives.

McCarthy, Kathryn A., vice president, research and development, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada. For leadership in research and data analysis in support of licensing extensions for light water nuclear reactors.

McGill, Laura J., vice president, engineering, Raytheon Missile Systems, Tucson, Ariz. For technical leadership of missile systems for the United States and its allies.

McKinley, Gareth H., mechanical engineering department, School of Engineering Professor of Teaching Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. For contributions in rheology, understanding of complex fluid dynamical instabilities, and interfacial engineering of super-repellent textured surfaces.

Moghaddam, Mahta, William M. Hogue Professorship in Electrical Engineering and professor of electrical engineering-electrophysics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. For development of physics-based computational algorithms for mapping of subsurface characteristics.

Mokhtari, Sasan, president and chief executive officer, Open Access Technology International Inc., Minneapolis. For development of software for web-based electric power transmission access, including tagging and scheduling.

Morel, Thomas A., president, Gamma Technologies Inc., Westmont, Ill. For development of computer-aided engineering tools for engines and vehicles.

Morris, Robert T., professor, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. For contributions to programmable network routers, wireless mesh networks, and networked computer systems.

Moyer, Mary Pat, founder, chief executive officer, and chief science officer, INCELL Corp. LLC, San Antonio. For entrepreneurship and development of cell lines, cell media, and testing technologies for regenerative medicine and biopharma products.

Nunes, Sharon L., retired vice president, smarter cities and big green innovations, IBM Corp., Falmouth, Mass. For corporate leadership in development of next-generation green technologies, focusing on novel materials and processes.

O'Sullivan, Stephanie L., consultant and retired principal deputy director, U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Duck Key, Fla. For science, technology, and leadership in national security.

Picard, Rosalind, professor and director of affective computing research, Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. For contributions to effective and wearable computing.

Pines, Darryll J., professor and dean, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park. For inspirational leadership and contributions to engineering education excellence in the United States.

Prather, Kimberly A., Distinguished Chair in Atmospheric Chemistry, department of chemistry and biochemistry and Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif. For technologies that transformed understanding of aerosols and their impacts on air quality, climate, and human health.

Reid, John, director, product technology and innovation, Moline Technology Innovation Center, John Deere, Moline, Ill. For innovation in automation technologies for agricultural systems.

Samuel, Clifford M., senior vice president, access operations and emerging markets, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, Calif. For innovations in supply chain management and manufacturing technologies central to delivering medication in developing countries.

San Martin, A. Miguel, chief engineer, guidance, navigation, and control, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. For technical contributions and leadership in guidance, navigation, and control leading to successful Mars entry, descent, and landing.

Sarter, Nadine B., professor, industrial and operations engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. For innovation in the design and use of tactile displays for improved safety in aviation, automobiles, and health care.

Schuh, Christopher A., department head and professor, materials science and engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. For contributions to design science and application of nanocrystalline metals.

Scott, Robert A., vice president, technology transfer, surgical research and development, Alcon, Lake Forest, Calif. For contributions in ophthalmological biomaterials for intraocular lenses, glaucoma implants, and surgical equipment.

Seltzer, Margo I., Herchel Smith Professor of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. For engineering contributions to databases, file systems, and operating systems.

Semiatin, Sheldon Lee, senior scientist, materials/processing science and research leader, Metals Processing Group, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. For contributions to thermomechanical processing of aerospace alloys and emerging intermetallic materials.

Shanahan, Patrick M., acting secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. For aerospace industry leadership in commercial aircraft, missile defense, and rotorcraft and for service to the Department of Defense.

Shoop, Barry L., dean and professor of electrical engineering, Albert Nerken School of Engineering, The Cooper Union, New York City. For leadership in developing engineering systems solutions for national security and contributions to military engineering education.

Shyu, Heidi, president and chief executive officer, Heidi Shyu Inc., Arlington, Va. For development of innovative radar/electro-optics/infrared systems in support of the U.S. Army and Air Force.

Sigur, Wanda A., retired vice president and deputy general manager, civil space, Lockheed Martin Corp., Seabrook, Texas. For contributions to human spaceflight exploration systems.

Smith, Jane McKee, senior research scientist for hydrodynamic phenomena, Engineering Research and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss. For leadership in coastal engineering research and development resulting in improved infrastructure resilience.

Speer, John G., John Henry Moore Distinguished Professor and director, Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden. For the conception, invention, and reduction to practice of quenching and partitioning steel.

Stanney, Kay M., president and founder, Design Interactive Inc., Orlando, Fla. For contributions to human factors engineering through virtual reality technology and strategic leadership.

Stein, Robert M., consultant, Brookline, Mass. For contributions to electronic systems for national security applications.

Stephens, Daniel B., chairman of the board and principal hydrologist, Daniel B. Stephens & Associates Inc., Albuquerque, N.M. For innovations in vadose zone hydrologic practice and theory.

Tabors, Richard, president, Tabors Caramanis Rudkevich, Boston. For development of technologies for real-time locational pricing of electricity for reduced electric transmission congestion.

Tarokh, Vahid, Rhodes Family Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, N.C. For contributions to space-time coding and its applications to multi-antenna wireless communications.

Thapar, Hemant K., chairman and chief executive officer, OmniTier Inc., Milpitas, Calif. For contributions to theory and practice of coding and signal processing for high-density magnetic recording.

Tom, Jean W., group director, process research and development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, N.J. For leadership in the process development of multiple commercialized drugs.

Tomlin, Claire J., Charles A. Desoer Chair and professor, electrical engineering and computer sciences, University of California, Berkeley. For contributions to design tools for safety-focused control of cyberphysical systems.

Trolier-McKinstry, Susan, professor of ceramic science and engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park. For development of thin film multilayer ceramic capacitors and piezoelectric microelectromechanical systems.

Tsividis, Yannis, Edwin Howard Armstrong Professor of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City. For contributions to analog and mixed-signal integrated circuit technology and engineering education.

Udren, Eric A., executive adviser, Quanta Technologies, Raleigh, N.C. For leadership in advancing protection technologies for electric power grids.

Vaidyanathan, P.P., Kiyo and Eiko Tomiyasu Professor of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena. For contributions to digital filter bank theory and design.

Wang, Christine A., senior staff scientist, Laser Technology and Applications Group, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Mass. For contributions to epitaxial crystal growth of III-V compound semiconductors and design of organometallic vapor-phase epitaxy reactors.

Wu, Margaret M., retired senior scientific adviser, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co., Odenton, Md. For contributions to synthetic lubricants for improved energy efficiency and machine protection.

New Foreign Members

Bétin, Pierre Claude, retired senior vice president, Safran S.A./SNECMA, Villenave d'Ornon, France. For leadership of Europe's solid rocket propulsion industry and contributions to launch and missile systems.

Brignole, Esteban A., professor emeritus, chemical engineering, Universidad Nacional Sur/CONICET, Bahia Blanca, Argentina. For contributions to molecular design of solvents, modeling of high-pressure phase equilibria, and leadership in research and academic-industry collaborations.

Cates, Michael E., Lucasian Professor of Mathematics and Royal Society Research Professor, department of applied mathematics and theoretical physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. For research on the rheology, dynamics, and thermodynamics of complex fluids, and for scientific leadership in the European Community.

de Geus, Aart J., chairman and co-chief executive officer, Synopsys Inc., Mountain View, Calif. For leadership and technical contributions to logic synthesis for integrated circuits.

Dordain, Jean-Jacques, consultant and former director general, European Space Agency, Paris. For contributions to complex space systems and leadership of space exploration programs worldwide.

Dyson, James, chairman and founder, Dyson Technology Ltd., Malmesbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom. For development of advanced technologies and innovative products and for contributions to design and engineering education.

Jonah, Samuel E., executive chairman, Jonah Capital, Accra, Ghana. For leadership and technical contributions in advancing the mineral industry in Africa.

Laporte, Gilbert, Canada Research Chair in Distribution Management and professor, department of decision sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Canada. For domain-defining contributions to the theory and practice of vehicle routing, facility location, and distribution management.

Mair, Robert, emeritus professor of civil engineering and director of research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. For contributions to underground construction and smart infrastructure and for leadership in government, engineering practice, research, and education.

Mazumdar-Shaw, Kiran, chairperson and managing director, Biocon Limited, Bangalore, India. For development of affordable biopharmaceuticals and the biotechnology industry in India.

Murray, Christopher B., Richard Perry University Professor of Chemistry and Materials Science Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. For invention and development of solvothermal synthesis of monodisperse nanocrystal quantum dots for displays, photovoltaics, and memory.

Qu, Jiuhui, professor, Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. For development of water treatment technology and leadership in improving water quality in China.

Ramamoorty, Mylavarapu, former chancellor, K L University, Vijayawada, Nacharam, Hyderabad, India. For technical leadership of power engineering research, development, education, and establishing national laboratories in India.

Rudnick, Hugh, emeritus professor, electrical engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. For leadership in South American electric power markets, resource and transmission planning, and standards.

Sohrabpour, Saeed, professor, mechanical engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. For establishing Sharif University as an academic Center of Excellence and advancing engineering and science education in Iran.

Spaldin, Nicola A., professor for materials theory, ETH Zürich, Zürich. For theoretical contributions to advance the field of multiferroics.

Stevens, Molly, professor of biomedical materials and regenerative medicine, Imperial College - London, South Kensington, United Kingdom. For contributions to materials-based approaches for tissue regeneration and biosensing.

Zheludev, Nikolay, head of nanophotonics and metamaterials, Optoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. For leadership and technical contributions to optical metamaterials and nanophotonics.

*Elected posthumously

###

Contacts:

Randy Atkins, Senior Program Officer Media/Public Relations202-334-1508; e-mail <<a href="http://killexams.com/mailto:atkins@nae.edu">atkins@nae.edu>

Kim Garcia, Membership Elections Manager202-334-2195; e-mail <<a href="http://killexams.com/mailto:kgarcia@nae.edu">kgarcia@nae.edu>National Academy of Engineering

Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

References :

Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11583538
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-O6
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/000-068
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12114133
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/11/pass4sure-000-068-dumps-and-practice.html
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000VQNE
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526c3ff55a8eae3
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/pass4sure-000-068-real-question-bank
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/6f8e21mih83qz8h6rtl8yziuqy983vpj
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5psib4061bef57d4d435c9e013b0ba66ade5b